Hinnavaatlus
:: Foorum
:: Uudised
:: Ärifoorumid
:: HV F1 ennustusvõistlus
:: Pangalink
:: Telekavad
:: HV toote otsing
|
|
autor |
|
mikk36
HV Guru

liitunud: 21.02.2004
|
31.01.2014 22:14:28
|
|
|
SSD, 200€ videokaardiga kaevad kusagil 4€ päevas vähemalt.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
iks95
Kreisi kasutaja
liitunud: 09.10.2010
|
31.01.2014 22:49:13
|
|
|
300euro eest saab juba ka 38gh/s -lise aparaadi
_________________ Binance
Tekstiilipesuri rent Tallinnas Tondil. 17EUR/24H |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Randombit
HV vaatleja
liitunud: 09.11.2013
|
31.01.2014 22:58:47
|
|
|
Char kirjutas: |
kus te soovitate dogecoine müüa? |
www.coinex.pw või siis www.cryptsy.com
Coinexis on müntide sisse-väljakandmine kiirem aga tehinguid jälle vähem, seega suurt kogust keeruline müüa. Aga sul vist esialgu suurt kogust veel ei ole. Üldiselt väga vahet ei ole, proovi mõlemat ja kasuta siis emb-kumb endale rohkem meeldib.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Chidori
HV Guru

liitunud: 19.09.2007
|
31.01.2014 23:29:15
|
|
|
Pisar tuli silma:
tsitaat: |
Number: 77,869
Validity: Confirmed!
Finder: Chidori
Found: 2 days ago
Reward: 262,955.1003
Your reward: 8,211.39977332 DOGE |
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
SSD
HV Guru

liitunud: 18.01.2006
|
31.01.2014 23:45:21
|
|
|
mikk36 kirjutas: |
SSD, 200€ videokaardiga kaevad kusagil 4€ päevas vähemalt. |
270x maksiski enam-vähem 200€ aga 4€ päevas ei tule kuidagi
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Magic
HV Guru

liitunud: 28.12.2001
|
31.01.2014 23:49:58
|
|
|
2,5-3 kanti pigem...
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
InsidePC
HV kasutaja

liitunud: 02.02.2005
|
31.01.2014 23:51:54
|
|
|
Mul hetkel GTX680 pumpab 330 gh/s ringis + siis 48 CPU i73770k ning kuskil 2€ kanti päev tuleb
_________________ If you design it, it will break.
If you fix it and it's not broke it will be ruined.
If you just walk away you can't make it any worse. |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Chidori
HV Guru

liitunud: 19.09.2007
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Char
HV kasutaja

liitunud: 15.01.2007
|
01.02.2014 00:16:11
|
|
|
Randombit kirjutas: |
Char kirjutas: |
kus te soovitate dogecoine müüa? |
www.coinex.pw või siis www.cryptsy.com
Coinexis on müntide sisse-väljakandmine kiirem aga tehinguid jälle vähem, seega suurt kogust keeruline müüa. Aga sul vist esialgu suurt kogust veel ei ole. Üldiselt väga vahet ei ole, proovi mõlemat ja kasuta siis emb-kumb endale rohkem meeldib. |
kuidas dogecoine üldse linuxil kaevandada..juba walletit vaatasin, et linuxi versiooni ei ole..
kas nendel saitidel USD või EUR vastu saab vahetada dogecoine? cryptsysse regasin, ei tundunud olevat võimalust.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
InsidePC
HV kasutaja

liitunud: 02.02.2005
|
01.02.2014 00:28:53
|
|
|
Jah minu kirja viga .... gh/s oleks liiga hea loota
_________________ If you design it, it will break.
If you fix it and it's not broke it will be ruined.
If you just walk away you can't make it any worse. |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
pyrex
Aeg Maha 2a

liitunud: 05.08.2004
|
01.02.2014 00:35:58
|
|
|
Spoiler 
It's way too often that people think that a high ASIC % means "high quality". This is actually the opposite though. It denotes the leakage of the ASIC (GPU core) and ties in with TBP (total board power) or TDP (thermal design power). Graphics cards are designed to run with a specific power consumption and thermal output in mind. Higher ASIC % = higher leakage = higher power consumption = lower default voltage to keep temperatures/power consumption down within safe limits. Lower ASIC % = lower leakage = lower power consumption = higher default voltage, because the manufacturers want a consistent power consumption and thermal output.
If you run an 85% ASIC video card at the same voltage as the default voltage of a 65% ASIC video card of the same make and model, and run it in furmark with unlocked/maxxed out powertune, you will find that the 85% ASIC video card will likely have temperatures spiral out of control, and likely even turn off the system (This actually happened to me when I parted out my radeon 7970 mining rigs and tested them individually). Also, because of the increased power consumption, you will stress out the VRMs much more, especially in overclocking, possibly resulting in exploding VRM chips.
Typically, you will want the lowest ASIC % cards you can find. They will have a much larger headroom as far as power consumption (and by proxy, overclocking) goes, and will typically use less power and have lower temperatures compared to a high ASIC % card. As far as stable max overclock speeds, this is still a hit/miss situation.
Lugemist eelkõige neile, kes kaartide ASIC quality kohta eriti ei tea.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Kristoferr
HV Guru

liitunud: 26.11.2006
|
01.02.2014 01:25:28
|
|
|
pyrex kirjutas: |
Spoiler 
It's way too often that people think that a high ASIC % means "high quality". This is actually the opposite though. It denotes the leakage of the ASIC (GPU core) and ties in with TBP (total board power) or TDP (thermal design power). Graphics cards are designed to run with a specific power consumption and thermal output in mind. Higher ASIC % = higher leakage = higher power consumption = lower default voltage to keep temperatures/power consumption down within safe limits. Lower ASIC % = lower leakage = lower power consumption = higher default voltage, because the manufacturers want a consistent power consumption and thermal output.
If you run an 85% ASIC video card at the same voltage as the default voltage of a 65% ASIC video card of the same make and model, and run it in furmark with unlocked/maxxed out powertune, you will find that the 85% ASIC video card will likely have temperatures spiral out of control, and likely even turn off the system (This actually happened to me when I parted out my radeon 7970 mining rigs and tested them individually). Also, because of the increased power consumption, you will stress out the VRMs much more, especially in overclocking, possibly resulting in exploding VRM chips.
Typically, you will want the lowest ASIC % cards you can find. They will have a much larger headroom as far as power consumption (and by proxy, overclocking) goes, and will typically use less power and have lower temperatures compared to a high ASIC % card. As far as stable max overclock speeds, this is still a hit/miss situation.
Lugemist eelkõige neile, kes kaartide ASIC quality kohta eriti ei tea. |
See jutt ei päris tõsi. Faktidega on puusse pandud.
Kõrge asic võimaldab suuremat underclocki ja suuremat OC´d plusskraadidel.
Kui võtta näiteks 60% ASIC ja 80% ASIC kaardid ning nende limiite katsetada, siis 80% ASIC kaart on võimeline sama pinge juures saavutama suuremat takti JA kasutab vähem energiat sama takti juures, sest on võimeline jooksma väiksemal pingel.
Lekke tõttu tekkinud kuumus < pinge tõttu tekkinud kuumus.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
mikk36
HV Guru

liitunud: 21.02.2004
|
01.02.2014 01:39:22
|
|
|
pyrex kirjutas: |
Spoiler 
It's way too often that people think that a high ASIC % means "high quality". This is actually the opposite though. It denotes the leakage of the ASIC (GPU core) and ties in with TBP (total board power) or TDP (thermal design power). Graphics cards are designed to run with a specific power consumption and thermal output in mind. Higher ASIC % = higher leakage = higher power consumption = lower default voltage to keep temperatures/power consumption down within safe limits. Lower ASIC % = lower leakage = lower power consumption = higher default voltage, because the manufacturers want a consistent power consumption and thermal output.
If you run an 85% ASIC video card at the same voltage as the default voltage of a 65% ASIC video card of the same make and model, and run it in furmark with unlocked/maxxed out powertune, you will find that the 85% ASIC video card will likely have temperatures spiral out of control, and likely even turn off the system (This actually happened to me when I parted out my radeon 7970 mining rigs and tested them individually). Also, because of the increased power consumption, you will stress out the VRMs much more, especially in overclocking, possibly resulting in exploding VRM chips.
Typically, you will want the lowest ASIC % cards you can find. They will have a much larger headroom as far as power consumption (and by proxy, overclocking) goes, and will typically use less power and have lower temperatures compared to a high ASIC % card. As far as stable max overclock speeds, this is still a hit/miss situation.
Lugemist eelkõige neile, kes kaartide ASIC quality kohta eriti ei tea. |
Miskipärast usaldan ma pigem GPU-Z'i infot.
Spoiler 
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
yerba
HV Guru

liitunud: 12.11.2003
|
01.02.2014 12:49:22
|
|
|
Täna on vaja õues lumecoine kaevandada, füüsiliselt.
Aga kaevandamise psühholoogiast - elu on näidanud et kaevandaja on kõige vaesem inimene üldse - nagu mingit raha tekib, on vaja kohe mingi uus arvutividin osta. Vähemalt minul on selline kiiks tekkinud nüüd. On kellelgi veel nii?
_________________ www.lapik.ee - parima hinnaga patareid!
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Magic
HV Guru

liitunud: 28.12.2001
|
01.02.2014 13:04:11
|
|
|
Ma arvan, et mingi eliitjupp pole raha mahaviskamine - mul OCZ toide kestis 7-8a. ja lõpuks suri see EE (Thanks Elektrilevi) surma.
Nüüd optimeerisin neid kaevureid ehitades, aga eelkõige seetõttu et pea kõik hea on kokku ostetud
Üks katkise piniga Gigabutt emaplaat vaja ka käima ajada...
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
format666
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 23.07.2003
|
01.02.2014 13:51:55
|
|
|
GA-990FXA-UD3 coinimiseks soliidne? mingi vahe mis prose sinna peale paneb?
(amd suht v66ras,senimaani koik inteli peale ehitatud)
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
pyrex
Aeg Maha 2a

liitunud: 05.08.2004
|
01.02.2014 14:30:44
|
|
|
mikk36 kirjutas: |
pyrex kirjutas: |
Spoiler 
It's way too often that people think that a high ASIC % means "high quality". This is actually the opposite though. It denotes the leakage of the ASIC (GPU core) and ties in with TBP (total board power) or TDP (thermal design power). Graphics cards are designed to run with a specific power consumption and thermal output in mind. Higher ASIC % = higher leakage = higher power consumption = lower default voltage to keep temperatures/power consumption down within safe limits. Lower ASIC % = lower leakage = lower power consumption = higher default voltage, because the manufacturers want a consistent power consumption and thermal output.
If you run an 85% ASIC video card at the same voltage as the default voltage of a 65% ASIC video card of the same make and model, and run it in furmark with unlocked/maxxed out powertune, you will find that the 85% ASIC video card will likely have temperatures spiral out of control, and likely even turn off the system (This actually happened to me when I parted out my radeon 7970 mining rigs and tested them individually). Also, because of the increased power consumption, you will stress out the VRMs much more, especially in overclocking, possibly resulting in exploding VRM chips.
Typically, you will want the lowest ASIC % cards you can find. They will have a much larger headroom as far as power consumption (and by proxy, overclocking) goes, and will typically use less power and have lower temperatures compared to a high ASIC % card. As far as stable max overclock speeds, this is still a hit/miss situation.
Lugemist eelkõige neile, kes kaartide ASIC quality kohta eriti ei tea. |
Miskipärast usaldan ma pigem GPU-Z'i infot.
Spoiler 
|
Nojah, ega ma tegelikult ei tea mis õige on, aga huvitav lugemine oli ikka
Läbi kelle te neid ASRock H81 PRO BTC plaate tellisite?
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
KAMY
HV kasutaja
liitunud: 16.12.2013
|
01.02.2014 15:31:22
|
|
|
Mis võib olla valesti, et undervolditud (R9280x - V=1,075) neljast kaardist kahele näidatakse sgmineris kõrgemat V (1,163 ja 1,200)? Kui panna kaart eraldi/üksi masinasse, siis on V=1,075.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Kristoferr
HV Guru

liitunud: 26.11.2006
|
01.02.2014 15:38:40
|
|
|
SGminer ja CGminer ei oska uuemate kaartide VDDC muuta ega monitoorida. Uskuda võid ainult GPUz mõõte.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
InsidePC
HV kasutaja

liitunud: 02.02.2005
|
01.02.2014 15:44:46
|
|
|
Hetkel 6950 umbes 80€ maksta, et kaevandada on normaalne hind ?
_________________ If you design it, it will break.
If you fix it and it's not broke it will be ruined.
If you just walk away you can't make it any worse. |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
The_Boss
HV Guru

liitunud: 13.01.2009
|
01.02.2014 17:51:54
|
|
|
InsidePC, teeb üle 400 tavaliselt ehk suhkoht 270 lähedale, aga on odavam.
_________________ Pakun sülearvutite tolmupuhastust, termopasta vahetust, emaplaatide remonti ja BIOS paroolide eemaldust. |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Magic
HV Guru

liitunud: 28.12.2001
|
01.02.2014 17:58:01
|
|
|
The_Boss kirjutas: |
InsidePC, teeb üle 400 tavaliselt ehk suhkoht 270 lähedale, aga on odavam. |
Jah, kui kaart kestab 2-3 kuud, siis puhas võit.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
KAMY
HV kasutaja
liitunud: 16.12.2013
|
01.02.2014 18:42:18
|
|
|
Palun smos Linuxi sgminer.confi Gigabyte R9280X kaardile. Windowsis kasutatud parameetrid, mis annavad vabalt avg 730khs millegipärast ei anna linuxis tulemust. Proovisin ka seda http://www.smos-linux.org/cfg/gigabyte.280x , kuid jääb madalamaks, kui windowsis.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
kivilaid
HV vaatleja
liitunud: 23.03.2008
|
01.02.2014 18:53:10
|
|
|
KAMY kirjutas: |
Palun smos Linuxi sgminer.confi Gigabyte R9280X kaardile. Windowsis kasutatud parameetrid, mis annavad vabalt avg 730khs millegipärast ei anna linuxis tulemust. Proovisin ka seda http://www.smos-linux.org/cfg/gigabyte.280x , kuid jääb madalamaks, kui windowsis. |
Mul on sarnane asi. 3x280x W8.1 all ja 720. Proovisin BAMTi ja ei saa üle 650 ... samad seaded, teised seaded- vahet pole
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
ollumees
HV kasutaja
liitunud: 11.08.2005
|
01.02.2014 19:10:10
|
|
|
Oleks väga vaja üht pcie1x to 16x kaablit. Olen nõus ka üle maksma, tahaks lihtsalt kogu rigi täna jooksma saada. Pakkumine PM.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
|