[Mucrop3]

[Tomorrow]

[1dumbpcuser]

Study: Vista Startup Time is Faster Than Win 7
Tomshardware

Even if Windows 7 isn't proven by benchmarks to be the fastest, bestest version of Microsoft's operating system yet, it certainly feels a lot better. We'd use it over Windows Vista any day of the week, but new findings show that it's not the performance king – at least not yet.

Sure, there have been many tweaks under the hood to make it better than Windows Vista, but it seems that boot time is actually longer in Windows 7 – at least according to a certain standard.

LA-based iolo technologies, makers of System Mechanic PC tune-up software, sent Tom's Hardware some of its findings after spending time with Windows 7.

Windows 7 starts up slower than Vista (1:34 vs 1:06 on a brand new machine), when the actual time to usability is considered. While Windows 7 shows its desktop relatively quickly (time to desktop hovers around 40 seconds for fresh installations), its time to usability, defined as the length of time it takes for the computer to become fully usable, with CPU cycles no longer significantly high and a true idle state achieved, is significantly longer.

Windows 7 boot times slow down dramatically with the addition of common-used software and for a 0-3 month-old machine measure 2:34 (that’s a minute longer than out of the box).

The newer OS seems to keep its composure better after some real-world use, perhaps signalling a design that's better suited to perform for most computer owners.

Windows 7 only beats Vista start-up times on 3-month-old and 6-month-old machines, otherwise trailing the older version significantly.

Stay tuned early next week when iolo technologies will reveal more of its Windows 7 performance findings. We'll have the coverage first hand.

[Lennnukas]

Meil programmeerimise õppejõud ütles tunnis, et Vista on parem benchmark arvutile kui 3Dmark
Vistaga arvuti veedab enamus oma elust koomas.
Seda ütles ta selle peale, kui tema uus 20 000 arvuti jooksis kogu aeg aknaid vahetades kokku.

[Tomorrow]

[Look Right]

Emal läks tööjuures arvuti lolliks, mingid viirused sees jamavad. Vista installieriga saab kuidagi teha ka full formatit või on vaja selleks kasutada mingeid 3rd party asju?
Kuna ise vistat pole kasutanud, siis ei tea.

[painkillah]

kui vista plaadilt bootid, siis on täitsa variant enne installimist olemas, et ka formatid ketast.

[SKG]

[Look Right]

Seda ma arvasin. 7 ei saanud teha, oletasin, et Vista all sama jama

[Mucrop3]

[XYZ]

[Look Right]

No väidetavalt olla juba kiirformat tehtud, kuid arvuti ikka jamab. Full format oleks kindel lahendus.

[XYZ]

Siis kasuta kettatootjate utiliite

[mikk36]

[Etz]

Spoiler

tomorrow kirjutas:

1dumbpcuser kirjutas: Study: Vista Startup Time is Faster Than Win 7 Tomshardware Stay tuned early next week when iolo technologies will reveal more of its Windows 7 performance findings. We'll have the coverage first hand. See on suurim bullshit mida ma viimasel ajal kuulnud olen Kuuldavasti testisid nad C2D masinaga.Kuidas keegi saab rohkem kui minuti pikkuse boot time on beyond me .Minul on alla minuti olnud mõlemad ja Win7 täpselt poole kiirem Vistast Tegelik põhjus peitub siin: tsitaat: IOLO technologies sells PC tune up software. They have a conflict of interest. i.e. it's in their interest to claim that Win7 is slow and needs their tune up software Seega täiesti biased värk tsitaat: iolo Technologies self-proclaimed "PC Tune-Up Experts". Clearly this study was TOTALLY unbiased and in NO WAY meant to drum up sales of their software..... /sarcasm Without any apps installed that load at start up, the ""fully usable", with a low load on the processor" is nearly instantly. I say nearly because it has to load your desktop icons and anything pinned to the taskbar. Even with a bunch of apps I use (including some I've written myself), the longest thing I have to wait for is Alcohol to do its virtual drive thing. If your boot time is above TWO MINUTES, no software is going to be able to fix what you fucked up.

ProfiiliMasinal W7 x64 boot ca ~20s (kooos loginiga , desktopile) , debian x64 samas masinas 55s, Ext4

[Blacktor]

Selline küsimus ,et mis programm windows vistal töötaks millega oleks võimalik kõvaketast poolitada?

[friik1]

1. Kirves
2. Suvaline, mis NTFS'i oskab, kasvõi DISKPART.

[dzombe]

[Tomorrow]

[hugo]

Kuidas peaksin käituma,kui arvuti ostuga (Vista) tuli kaasa W7 võti , kuidas see upgrade protsess välja näeb ?

[hashi]

[hugo]

[Tomorrow]

[londiste]

tomorrow, kui 2 gigaga testid, siis on 'pisut' keeruline jah...
mul jookseb mälutarbivuse graafik üldiselt desktopi peal. mängust välja tulles on droppi omapärane vaadata

rfactor on omajagu special case ja mitte mainstream mäng.

[Mucrop3]

4Gb on liiga vähe, või piirile liiga lähedal.
Näiteks kui Vista võtab 1-1,5Gb + 1.5Gb mäng + failide copy/ open ajalugu (mis jääb mällu kui seda vaba on) + mingi töö mida parajasti vaheldumisi mängimisega ehk teed.
Näiteks teksti dokument võib ka mitu Giga võtta kui ta sisaldab palju graafikat. Photoshopis /Gimpis kui palju layereid on ja suur reso läheb jälle kõvasti mälu.

Aga mängimine + interneti brausimine on ilmselt mõnda aega ohutu 4Gb-ga. DDR2 on samas nii odav, et tasub rohkem muretseda kuna HDD ei kulu nii palju. Mäletan kuidas esimene HDD andis otsad peale ~2a, mingi mäng laadis 10 min, panin sama palju mälu juurde siis laadis 30 sec.