[Etsike]

Eriti kommenteerida ei oska aga sellised nad on uus ja vana ketas.

1) Samsung SP1213N, 120 GB, 7200rpm, 8 MB cache

Random Access 13,4 ms
Read Burst 72.5 MB/s
Read Speed: max 65.1 MB/s, min 28.0 MB/s, avg 51.9 MB/s
CPU utilization 12.7 %

2) Western Digital Caviar WD100EB-00BHF0, 10 GB, pöörleb kah ja cache mälu on ka kindlasti olemas mingis koguses

Random Access 17,9 ms
Read Burst 77.6 MB/s
Read Speed: max 26.0 MB/s, min 14.3 MB/s, avg 19.0 MB/s
CPU utilization 10.8 %

[SKG]

2 × Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 80GB 7200RPM 8MB SATA II NCQ @ RAID 0 64K

READ BURST: 145MB/s

nForce MCP-04


varsti ka nelja ketta tulemus

[Ho Ho]

Mis sa sellest burstist näitad, tavaline read speed on see mis reaalelus tähtis on

[SKG]

beat this!


Burst Speed: 365MB/s
Average Read: 160MB/s
CPU utilization: 5%

[Magic]

Maxtor DMP 10
avg. 45,4MB/s burst 122MB/s
random access 16,4ms... masendav Hitachi on siin märksa kiirem

[KrikU]

maxtor diamondmax9 80gb 8mb cache

random access time: 13,4ms
read burst: 110.4MB/s
maximum speed: 64.5MB/s
minimum: 28.3MB/s
average: 49.2MB/s
CPU: 26.6%

nforce2 ultra-400 @ NF7-SL

Väga rahul odava ja mitte enam väga uue ning 1 ketta (mitte raid0) kohta igaljuhul Areng on suht toppama jäänud ketaste osas

[SKG]

prose koormus on kudagi kahtlaselt palju. kõik proged olid ikka kinni?

[lightbluefox]

random access time: 17,7ms
read burst: 70MB/s
maximum speed: 39.6MB/s
minimum: 24.3MB/s
average: 34.3MB/s
CPU: 25%

not bad


e: kui veel teste teha, need varieeruvad kõvasti nt miinimum oli 6.1mb/s, access time 17,3 vms

[SKG]

kõige täpsema tulemuse saab selle 32MB testiga...

[ivar111]

Seagate Barracuda 200GB 7200rpm SATA150 8MB

random access time: 12,2ms
read burst: 200MB/s
maximum speed: 1345.2MB/s
minimum: 20.8MB/s
average: 74.7MB/s
CPU: 5,3%

[maremark]

IBM 30 gb 7200rpm IDE

random access time: 13,2 ms
read burst:85,7 Mb/s

[iguaan]

mis värk on et seagate sata kettal on read burst 16Mb/s?

[Prayer]

[SKG]

[limp]

ma ei saanud nüüd aru kumba testi peab tegema, ei viitsinud ka kõike teksti läbi lugeda - kas quick või long?
endal tuli
longiga:
120GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9, 7200rpm, Serial-ATA, 8MB
Samsung SpinPoint P80 Series SP1213C 120GB 7200rpm SATA150 8MB
raid0
Burst Speed - 220.8 MB/s
Average Read - 93.6 MB/s
Random Access - 13,7ms
CPU Utilization - 0% (+/-2%)

nii et ei jää sata2-st eriti alla vist?

edit:
selle short variandiga tuli kehvemad tulemused - i guess:
Burst Speed - 216.4 MB/s
Average Read - 98.1 MB/s
Random Access - 13,7ms
CPU Utilization - 5% (+/-2%)

[SKG]

LONG (32MB) testiga saab täpsema tulemuse

[limp]

[High-Q]

2x160GB Samsung HD160JJ SATAII Raid-0
nForce4

long:
Burst Speed - 256.1 MB/s
Average Read - 98.4 MB/s
Random Access - 13,6ms
CPU Utilization - 5% (+/-2%)

http://web.starman.ee/highq/hdtach.GIF

[SKG]

[silver010]

nforce 2 ultra 400(nf7-s)
Hitachi 7k250 160gb sata

random access - 12.7ms
burst - 102.5mb/s
read speed average 49.3

cpu utilization: 29.5% (oskab keegi öelda miks nii palju , üks ketas btw)

[SKG]

[silver010]

mitte midagi erilist nagu ei tea kas tõesti winblinds, refreshlocker, daemon tools, aniblaxx ja microsoft antispyware võtavad nii palju

[tomsa]

South Bridge - nVIDIA MCP04 (DFI Lanparty
random access - 15,8 ms
burst - ? (joon on lõpus ehk siis 200 peal, täpset tulemust ei näita )
read speed - max 125,6 MB/s, min 10,8 MB/s, average 50,8 MB/s
ketas Maxtor 6L160M0

[limp]

[lightbluefox]

http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2005q4/chipset-raid/index.x?pg=1