[SKG]

peab tõdema, et too Silicon Image 3112A kontra ei kõlba koera saba alla ka.. VIA VT8237 lõunasillas olev kontra perfoormans on ikka tohutult üle

[Arvo Cobrietti]

[SKG]

[haldz]

peaks ka tegema

[Arvo Cobrietti]

[SKG]

Enne:

Kontroller: Silicon Image Sil3112A
Read burst speed: 118MB/s
Average read speed: 92MB/s
Random access time: 8,5ms
CPU utilization: 5%


Nüüd:

Kontroller: VIA VT8237 (lõunasild)
Read burst speed: 178MB/s
Average read speed: 100MB/s
Random access time: 8,5ms
CPU utilization: 5%


ps: mõlema puhul RAID 0 ja stripe suurus 16KB

[margusser]

random 13.3
read 114.7
max 65.4
min 31.0
average 49.5

ketas profiilis

[Alari A.]

random 8.7ms
read 100.9
max 81.9
min 36.2
average 50.2
ja kettaks 36gb wd raptor

[Magic]

Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 ST380013AS 80 GB 7200rpm SATA150 8MB
Random: 12,7ms
Burst: 95,9
avg. 47,2

[Hardi]

Hitachi deskstar , 40GB/7200rpm/2MB/UDMA 5

Random - 16,5ms
Burst - 86 MB/s
Average - 50,9 MB/s

[HDD]

Western Digital WD1200JB 120 Gb 7200 rpm Cache 8 Mb
Random access Time : 14,8
Read : 90,7 MB/s
Hmm lahti olid Mozilla , SmartFTP'ga sikutasin yhet jubinat ,msn ja avg ..

[bluepoint]

[RCC]

ei usu mina maapeal kah et via 237 oskab ja teab midagi jõudlusest? 235 pani pillid kotti kohe kui talle "raudruun" (creative kõik helikaardid) selga saata
aga räägitakse et imesid juhtub, ma olen skeptiline selles osas

[thunderz]

ketas IDE maxtor 120gb (2mb cache) :
chipset (ajutiselt) sis735 (max ata-100)
mem 2x256mb pc2100
cpu amd througbred 1800+
(see sis735 chipiga ajutine emaplate ei lase üldse midagi klokkida)

random access : 14,2 ms
read burst speed : 83,3 mb/s
read speed max : 62,7 mb/s
read speed min : 27,3 mb/s
read speed average : 48,7 mb/s
cpu utilization : 24,7 %

(kui uue emaplaadi ostan, panen uued andmed võrdluseks ülesse)

[rst]

panen siis oma tulemused ka siia
chipset on VIA VT8366A Apollo KT266A

www.hot.ee/lutsar/hddtest1.jpg

[MMX-Power]

Random Access Time: 15.3ms
Read Burst Speed: 85,4MB/s
Read Speed: MAX: 57.0MB/s MIN: 20.0MB/s AVERAGE: 44.8MB/s

ketas: 80gb seagate barracuda (2MB cache)
kiibistik: nForce3-250GB
mobo: EPoX EP-8KDA3J
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 2800+
RAM: 512MB DDR PC3200/400

samal ajal jooksid WinMX, Firefox, AV, Winamp, MSN jm.

[SCREAMER]

2x 36gb raptors 8mb cache 10000rpm raid0 16kb/16kb vs. 2x 80gb samsung 8mb cache 7200rpm sata2@sata1 raid0 16kb/16kb


ja compare file-d:
http://www.zone.ee/screamer/hdd/Intel_Raid_0_raptor_x2.hdc
http://www.zone.ee/screamer/hdd/Intel_Raid_0_samsung.hdc

[davidco]

Hitachi Travelstar 80GN 60GB ATA/100 4200RPM, 8 MB

Random access time - 36,6ms
read burst speed - 85,7MB/s
read speed max -30,6MB/s, min -11,7MB/s, average 23,1MB/s
cpu ut - 4,4%

[lock]

North Bridge: nVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400Gb (Crush18)
South Bridge: nVIDIA MCP2-ST

sai segate testitud , mis sattus minu kätte
40GB@2mb ST340014A

92.3 MB/S

graafikat ka : http://gom.pri.ee/fail/hdd.JPG
oma pea kettad on SATA , need lisan kunagi hiljem maybe

[kaits1234]

Tegin ka testi laptopi kõvakettaga:
chipset: intel 830m
kõvaketta toetus: kuni ultra ata100
ketas: ibm travelstar 20gb 4200rpm, 2mb ultra ata100
random acces time: 18,8ms
read burst speed: 87,8MB/s
read speed maximum: 21,3MB/s
minimum: 11,0MB/s
average: 16,9MB/s
cpu utilization: 4,3%

[bbbb]

on arvutis 3 ketast: 2*hitachi 2MB 80GB raid0 (kokku160GB) ata100 ja maxtor diamondplus9 8MB 6Y120M0 120GB sata (teise kettana).
maxtori test:
random access: 13,5ms
cpu utilisation: 2%
average read: 48.8 MB/s
burst: 117,9 MB/s

raid0 test:
random access: 13,1ms
cpu utilisation: 4%
average read: 80,6 MB/s
burst: 103,7 MB/s

Emaplaat asus p4p800 deluxe, chipset: Intel 82865PE ICH5R ja protsessor P4 2,8HT northwood fsb 800 mhz. raid controller via 6410. test: HD Tach3 long bench 32mb zones.

[Pets79]

Microlingi läpakas N350
chip-Intel Odem i855PM
Disk Drive SAMSUNG MP0402H (40 GB, 5400 RPM, Ultra-ATA/100)

random access 16,9ms
Read Brust 78,3MB/s
Read Speed - max 35,5MB/s, min 16,2MB/s, aver 26,6MB/s
CPU 6,3%

[H2iky]

Western Digital Caviar WD1600JD 160 GB 7200rpm 8MB SATA150

Random access: 14.8 sek
Read Burst: 200s
read max 63.7 mb/s
read min: 8.3 mb/s
read average: 50.3 mb/s
cpu: 28.3%

[peet]

1) Seagate ST340014A 40 Gb 2 MB cache, 7200 rpm

Random Access 15,1 ms
Read Burst 77.0 MB/s
Read Speed: max 60.0 MB/s, min 9,6 MB/s, avg 43.9 MB/s
CPU utilization 9.8 %

2) Seagate ST3160023A 160 GB 8 MB cache, 7200 rpm

Random Access 14.6 ms
Read Burst 78.4 MB/s
Read Speed: max 60.0 MB/s, min 28.0 MB/s, avg 46.8 MB/s
CPU utilization 12.8 %

[Synergy]

Random access time 13.6ms
Red burst speed 87.1Mb/s
Read speed max 56.3MB/s min 32.7MB/s avg 48.8MB/s
Cpu 37.0%

[Etsike]

Eriti kommenteerida ei oska aga sellised nad on uus ja vana ketas.

1) Samsung SP1213N, 120 GB, 7200rpm, 8 MB cache

Random Access 13,4 ms
Read Burst 72.5 MB/s
Read Speed: max 65.1 MB/s, min 28.0 MB/s, avg 51.9 MB/s
CPU utilization 12.7 %

2) Western Digital Caviar WD100EB-00BHF0, 10 GB, pöörleb kah ja cache mälu on ka kindlasti olemas mingis koguses

Random Access 17,9 ms
Read Burst 77.6 MB/s
Read Speed: max 26.0 MB/s, min 14.3 MB/s, avg 19.0 MB/s
CPU utilization 10.8 %

[SKG]

2 × Hitachi Deskstar 7K80 80GB 7200RPM 8MB SATA II NCQ @ RAID 0 64K

READ BURST: 145MB/s

nForce MCP-04


varsti ka nelja ketta tulemus

[Ho Ho]

Mis sa sellest burstist näitad, tavaline read speed on see mis reaalelus tähtis on

[SKG]

beat this!


Burst Speed: 365MB/s
Average Read: 160MB/s
CPU utilization: 5%

[Magic]

Maxtor DMP 10
avg. 45,4MB/s burst 122MB/s
random access 16,4ms... masendav Hitachi on siin märksa kiirem

[KrikU]

maxtor diamondmax9 80gb 8mb cache

random access time: 13,4ms
read burst: 110.4MB/s
maximum speed: 64.5MB/s
minimum: 28.3MB/s
average: 49.2MB/s
CPU: 26.6%

nforce2 ultra-400 @ NF7-SL

Väga rahul odava ja mitte enam väga uue ning 1 ketta (mitte raid0) kohta igaljuhul Areng on suht toppama jäänud ketaste osas

[SKG]

prose koormus on kudagi kahtlaselt palju. kõik proged olid ikka kinni?

[lightbluefox]

random access time: 17,7ms
read burst: 70MB/s
maximum speed: 39.6MB/s
minimum: 24.3MB/s
average: 34.3MB/s
CPU: 25%

not bad


e: kui veel teste teha, need varieeruvad kõvasti nt miinimum oli 6.1mb/s, access time 17,3 vms

[SKG]

kõige täpsema tulemuse saab selle 32MB testiga...

[ivar111]

Seagate Barracuda 200GB 7200rpm SATA150 8MB

random access time: 12,2ms
read burst: 200MB/s
maximum speed: 1345.2MB/s
minimum: 20.8MB/s
average: 74.7MB/s
CPU: 5,3%

[maremark]

IBM 30 gb 7200rpm IDE

random access time: 13,2 ms
read burst:85,7 Mb/s

[iguaan]

mis värk on et seagate sata kettal on read burst 16Mb/s?

[Prayer]

[SKG]

[limp]

ma ei saanud nüüd aru kumba testi peab tegema, ei viitsinud ka kõike teksti läbi lugeda - kas quick või long?
endal tuli
longiga:
120GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9, 7200rpm, Serial-ATA, 8MB
Samsung SpinPoint P80 Series SP1213C 120GB 7200rpm SATA150 8MB
raid0
Burst Speed - 220.8 MB/s
Average Read - 93.6 MB/s
Random Access - 13,7ms
CPU Utilization - 0% (+/-2%)

nii et ei jää sata2-st eriti alla vist?

edit:
selle short variandiga tuli kehvemad tulemused - i guess:
Burst Speed - 216.4 MB/s
Average Read - 98.1 MB/s
Random Access - 13,7ms
CPU Utilization - 5% (+/-2%)

[SKG]

LONG (32MB) testiga saab täpsema tulemuse

[limp]

[High-Q]

2x160GB Samsung HD160JJ SATAII Raid-0
nForce4

long:
Burst Speed - 256.1 MB/s
Average Read - 98.4 MB/s
Random Access - 13,6ms
CPU Utilization - 5% (+/-2%)

http://web.starman.ee/highq/hdtach.GIF

[SKG]

[silver010]

nforce 2 ultra 400(nf7-s)
Hitachi 7k250 160gb sata

random access - 12.7ms
burst - 102.5mb/s
read speed average 49.3

cpu utilization: 29.5% (oskab keegi öelda miks nii palju , üks ketas btw)

[SKG]

[silver010]

mitte midagi erilist nagu ei tea kas tõesti winblinds, refreshlocker, daemon tools, aniblaxx ja microsoft antispyware võtavad nii palju

[tomsa]

South Bridge - nVIDIA MCP04 (DFI Lanparty
random access - 15,8 ms
burst - ? (joon on lõpus ehk siis 200 peal, täpset tulemust ei näita )
read speed - max 125,6 MB/s, min 10,8 MB/s, average 50,8 MB/s
ketas Maxtor 6L160M0

[limp]

[lightbluefox]

http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2005q4/chipset-raid/index.x?pg=1