[Renka]

Saatsin F1 tüüpidele emaili küsimusega, et kuskohast meie riigis peaks F1'te jälgima.

järsku nad soovitavad mõne hea striimi/torrenti

[High-Q]

ehk siis puhta legaalselt saad lycka tilli või shaissesid ja võibolla huioovinat, aga mitte kohaliku või inglise keelset toodangut.

sky variant on niiöelda hall ala. tehniliselt on ilusti isikustatud tasuline konto (teenus oma olemuselt sarnaselt telia minu.tv või binge), lihtsalt ei tohiks seda väljaspool UK-d vaadata ja seetõttu tuleb VPN-i kasutada. aga pilt on päris hea, kuskil pole öeldud, aga tõenäoliselt 720p. igatahes mäekõrguselt üle VSB jms tavakraami. plus muidugi VPN-iga saad BBC kogu mudru (bbc iplayer) kätte ja skycinema videolaenutus või catchup tv (kordustv) on ikka valiku poolelt meie kohalikust toodangust mäekõrguselt üle.

[jeesus188]

Väike ot.

[alpha]

[jeesus188]

alpha, ma saan aru sellest.
Mu point oli, et ma maksaks korraliku pildi eest, mitte ei vaata stiimi kusaglit illegaalselt

[High-Q]

https://www.skycards.eu/product/sky-go-vpn/
maksad 20£ kuus all-in-one teenuse eest. mul on põmst sama, lihtsalt vpn on teise teenusepakkuja oma (mul oli eelnevalt üks vpn konto olemas bbc jaoks).

hardware põhine lahendus (sat + uk regatud kaart) on kallim, aga siis tavavaatamiseks pole vaja VPN-i ja kvaliteet kõrgem. küll vajab sky sat keskmisest suuremat taldrikut, eriti kui sa oled kirde eestis.

[weasel]

Huvitav kui lihtne see geoblokeering on? Võib-olla see algne uudis tehti ajal, mil VSB-ga veel läbirääkimised käisid ja loodeti papp kätte saada. Kui nüüd selgus, et VSB-st asja ei saa, lastakse teenus ka siin välja.

[WäntWõll]

Aeg näitab, ega täna vast keegi öelda oska.
Homme öösel esimesed kaks P seljataga siis hommikul vast foorumites müra küll mis saab ja kuidas.

[Tomorrow]

[jeesus188]

[Magic]

[jeesus188]

Samas võiks ju anda kordade arvu/ajalise piirangu drs jaoks. See tsooni piirang pole parim valik

[Porno Parm]

enjoy

Spoiler

tsitaat:

Formula 1 2018 World Championship Could it be possible that we are going to have a world championship that will not be won by a Mercedes driver? The odds suggest not with Mercedes as short as 1.57 to win their 5th constructors title in a row. It has been done before but I would suggest that for the sake of the sport it would be better if they didn’t. The sport is losing its grip on the public imagination. Bored with seeing Mercedes on pole on Saturday and winning on Sunday, nobody is much interested in that sort of predictability. Last season looked like it could be close between Hamilton and Vettel before a big midseason wobble for Ferrari allowed the Mercedes driver to canter to a comfortable title win by a 47 point margin. Red Bull was expected to put up a good fight but they launched a car that wasn’t working as expected due to problems correlating factory data with what was happening on track. They fixed that in the second half of the season and we saw their true potential with Verstappen winning two of the last six races. Not only was the Red Bull not working in the first half of the season, they were hamstrung by a poor Renault power unit. Under powered and unreliable, Red Bull suffered 11 DNF’s across the season. Compare that to Mercedes who only had a single non finish when Bottas suffered engine failure in Spain. The rest of the field were really just making up the numbers with Williams the only other team to score a podium and that was at the freaky Azerbaijan GP. Winter testing lived up its name this year with the first Barcelona test even losing a day’s work due to snow. The form guide that testing provides can be very useful occasionally but this year not so much. The Barcelona circuit had been resurfaced, Pirelli introduced its new range of tyres and the cold weather made the first test largely meaningless. There was more to learn from the second test, the weather was reasonable, but different teams were running different programs and making comparisons between the big three was very hard. Ferrari set the fastest lap of winter testing, as they did in 2017, but Mercedes never used the new hypersoft tyre for a qualifying simulation nor did Red Bull. Mercedes did impress over the long runs but we are a little in the dark here too as they only ran the medium tyre for their race simulation and of course the rules say that you have to use two different compounds in an actual race. Added to all that we have to expect that many of the cars that take to the track in Melbourne will be heavily upgraded form those seen in testing. Team by Team Mercedes: Good continuity in terms of drivers and staff. There has been further development of the class of the field power units with rumours suggesting they are very close to hitting the 1000bhp mark. Reliability in testing was excellent as usual, the car looked very well balanced in the corners and there were no obvious signs of weakness. The team are confident that it is a much better car than last year’s so the others will have to make big improvements just to stay in touch. The car was visibly impressive especially in the slower corners. It was the best over long runs but they never went for any real qualifying simulations on the softest tyres. They are still the team to beat but the gap to Red Bull and Ferrari isn’t huge and certainly not as big as we have become used to in recent pre-season tests. That said, as the team never went for a qualifying trim test…perhaps they will turn up in Melbourne and blow everyone away on Saturday. There is no doubt that Mercedes remain favourites to win their fifth constructors title in a row. They appear to have a couple of tenths over Ferrari and Red Bull, still have the best power unit and two very talented drivers in Hamilton and Bottas. Ferrari: Last year’s runners up have designed a car with a longer wheelbase, much like the Mercedes. This allows for more downforce to be generated from the floor of the car, better airflow over the bodywork which again producing more down force without increasing drag. The idea is to make the car stronger over a variety of circuits rather just being the best on the slow twisty circuits. Ferrari are pushing hard with power unit performance reportedly aiming for an improvement of 40 -50 bhp. That will still be behind Mercedes but getting within striking distance. However they have lost their engine man Lorenzo Sassi who is moving to Mercedes after he finishes his gardening leave. Ferrari have hit their targets on the dyno and have plans for a new cylinder head design coming in to use in the summer with the aim of improving their qualifying boost modes. The chassis has a lot of fine detailing and if they have improved on last year’s chassis, they will be close to having the best chassis on the grid. They have gone down the Red Bull route of running a very high angle of rake but perhaps they haven’t quite nailed it just yet with reports of a lot of dragging at the front end of the car as the floor hits the road. They had a very successful 2nd test, setting the fastest time by over a second and Vettel drove 184 laps without any problems. They seem to be in very good shape for the start of the season. The driver line up remains the same but is Raikkonen really worthy of a Ferrari seat? I would say that Mercedes have the edge on driver line up. Some observers were not overly impressed with their testing performance, saying that Red Bull will be Mercedes real threat, but Vettel is happy that the car has the pace to compete and that their best time wasn’t done with a light fuel load. Red Bull: One of last season’s biggest disappointments, Red Bull is looking to bounce back in 2018. They still have a Renault power unit despite its poor reliability last season, but that shouldn’t be the case this season as Renault has worked very hard to improve reliability. Drivers only have three power units to last the 21 races this season, so reliability is crucial. That said, Renault are likely to want to use more than three power units as it will allow them to introduce performance improvements through the season and it may well be that taking a grid penalty for one race will be balanced out by improved performance in the following races. Ricciardo and Verstappen remain some of the team’s best assets; both are race winners and good qualifiers. The RB14 appears to be a very well put together machine, taking the best technical elements of Red Bull's late charge in 2017 and combining it with other clever ideas used elsewhere on the grid. There has been a lot of effort put into the side pods in particular and it looks like Newey has worked his magic again. What will be interesting to see going forward is how much scope for development the team have throughout the season. They are regarded as arguably the best team at bringing improvements to the car in a very short space of time. The Renault power unit is likely to play a deciding role in Red Bull’s season. It cannot be as unreliable as it was last year and testing went well in that respect. It will still be down on power compared Mercedes and Ferrari so to win they have to have the best car. With Adrian Newey still involved in its design that is entirely possible and Red Bull have previously won championships with a car that was not powered by the best engine. The feeling post testing was that the car is a good improvement on the car that finished last season in very competitive form and there will be a significant upgrade on the car for the opening race in Melbourne. Renault: Still in the re-building stage, Renault continues to grow in terms of staff and resources. Their biggest job over the winter was to work on reliability, especially with the power unit. A new quality control process was put into place and judging by mileage in testing, it has paid dividends which is good news for them and their customers. It is worth mentioning the FIA have written to all engine manufactures to insist that customers must have exactly the same spec power units as the works team. They finished last season with what was regarded as the 4th best car and 4th place in the constructors table will be the target this season. They made a good stride back towards the top last year and continue to recruit good people. Controversially they have employed former FIA technical and sporting co-ordinator Marcin Budkowski who will have very detailed information about the technical specifications of every other team on the grid. He will not actually start work for the team until the end of April but he could prove to be a very useful addition to the team. Renault is also pushing the boundaries with the ‘blown rear wing’ seen on their new car. It has been deemed legal by the FIA and clearly they have stolen a bit of a march on their rivals. The time gains however are not thought to be huge but it is a sign of intent that they are working hard to get to the top table again. On top of addition staff recruitment, Renault has improved their technical resources. The wind tunnel was upgraded last season, a new gearbox dyno will be ready before the start of the 2018 season and they have installed a new CFD super computer for 2018. They are still not spending at the same level as the top three teams but if they can make another improvement in competitiveness then the Renault accountants may expend their budget for the forth coming years. The drivers, Hulkenberg and Sainz, are maybe not at the very top level but both are experienced and well able to take their opportunities. It was reported that Sainz wasn’t impressed with the speed of the car in the first test but Renault had said that their power units would be ‘massively tuned down’ for the opening test for reliability purposes but they will be tuned up for Melbourne along with an upgraded aero package. Race wins? Unlikely says Alain Prost, podiums maybe but not a win in 2018. Force India: Their prizemoney for finishing 4th last year is being used to improve factory infrastructure and improvements to Toyota’s German wind tunnel. The new car is said to be much like last year’s car visually and they wish to have a consistent car with which to develop through the season. At launch they had basically the 2017 car with a different paint job. Are they late in development or leaving just everything to the last minute? Team owner VL Mallaya is wanted by Indian police and is undergoing extradition. Rumours are building that the team will be sold. The driver line up remains the same with the experienced Perez and the exciting young French talent, Esteban Ocon. The two drivers made a bit of a habit of crashing into each other last season which led to the team stopping them for racing each other. That order has been rescinded, for now at least. It will be a difficult year for the team. Uncertainty over its ownership is not ideal and at the same time they will under much more pressure from McLaren, Renault, Haas and possibly Williams. Holding on to their 4th place looks to be a big challenge. For testing they brought a fairly straight forward car, not hugely different to last years, but they were able to get plenty of laps in. The car looked well balanced and reliable. Not especially quick but the plan is to have a good, stable best and then bring aero updates in to improve performance. The planned upgrades for Melbourne are hoped to bring 0.5 seconds more pace. The team know what they are doing and we should expect another respectable season in the midfield. They do not have the resources of Renault or McLaren but they do know how to get the most out of what they have got and a Mercedes power unit is a good start. McLaren: This is an important year for McLaren. They are a big, well-resourced company but they have not enjoyed any great success for years now. The Honda partnership turned out to be a nightmare and they took the decision late last season to cut their ties with the Japanese firm and become a Renault customer. It’s hard to blame them but it looks bad for a team to be a works team to then being a customer team. That is not to say that that customer teams cannot win championships but historically it is less likely. Nobody as a divine right to being a top team, even Ferrari despite what they think, and McLaren are drinking in the last chance saloon. Another year of failure and their future would look bleak. The signs are already there, no headline team sponsor and not many big stickers on the car. Sponsors don’t want to be associated with underachievers and that is what McLaren has become in recent years. Look at Williams….that could be the way McLaren will end up. Trading on past glories doesn’t pay the bills, it doesn’t bring in good sponsors and it makes the team a less attractive option for the best drivers. The late switch to Renault was a challenge to their designers. The two power units have a different architecture and fitting the Renault PU into the space needed for a Honda PU wasn’t easy. The car was over heating at the first test, holes had to be cut into the body work to help cooling and still there were scorch marks appearing on the body work. That is going to require a redesign before Melbourne. Testing was much better for McLaren than the farce they had for the last two seasons with Honda, but it wasn’t impressive. They had lots of niggly reliability issues and they missed a lot of track time. There were no signs that they can join the big three but Alonso is insisting that they can be in the hunt for 4th place and that the car is four seconds quicker than last year’s Honda powered car. Alonso has committed to competing in sports car racing this year which seems strange in a season with 21 F1 races. He will certainly be racking up the air miles and one has to wonder how he will cope with that physically. Hopefully well as Alonso is still one of the very best drivers on the grid. A better season for McLaren? Very probably. A good season for McLaren? If finishing in the mid field is classed as good then yes, but that’s really not enough for a ‘big’ team. Haas: This will only be Haas third year as a Formula 1 team and while they haven’t been particularly impressive in the first two years they have scored 76 points and were 8th in last year’s constructor’s championship. They are not a basket case like Sauber has been recently or the defunct Manor F1 team for example. The new car is an evolution of the 2017 car. The designers have reduced the weight of the car to give more flexibility in placement of blast to help the balance of the car. The idea being that the handling will be more consistent from track to track. There is nothing radically new about the car; they have just tried to address the weaknesses of last year’s model. There is more than a hint of the 2017 Ferrari chassis as the two teams are closely linked these days. The team is aiming to be no worse than 0.5 second off Ferrari this season. They may start the season reasonably well as the evolutionary car is likely to be reliable and uncomplicated. Their pace of development is however, questionable. They are unlikely to have a major upgrade for Melbourne for example while most of the other teams will. The pre-season testing left the team and their drivers impressed and optimistic. There was one run at the second test which may have looked fairly ordinary but if you took into account what tyres they and the other teams were using you could extrapolate that they set the second best time of testing. That may be a better example of how hard it is to make sense of testing than a real indicator of Haas’ pace but there is no doubting that they have impressed many observers. Some are going as far as to say that they will be in the fight for 4th place along with Renault and McLaren. The live wire dark horse for 2018? We shall see but they have definitely put themselves in the frame. The drivers will be happy that the team will reducing the amount of time that their test drivers will run on a Friday, preferring to give that precious track time to their regular drivers, Kevin Magnussen and Romain Grosjean. Last year’s car was blighted by brake problems but Grosjean has confirmed that this year’s car is free of those vices. The team have finally settled on one brake manufacturer, Carbone Industrie, having been switching suppliers last season in a desperate attempt to cure the problem. Toro Rosso: Toro Rosso will be using Honda PU’s this season which is a huge gamble. The car was designed around the Renault PU and the Honda unit is substantially difference in architecture. To start with a compromise is not a positive. This is their fourth different PU supplier in as many years which is poor for continuity and another late switch doesn’t help the design process. Toro Rosso engineers are said to be impressed with Honda technology, saying it is much more advanced than Renaults….but will it actually work? It seems the answer to that is yes. Toro Rosso completed more miles than any other team at the first test and had no reliability problems at all. Is their gamble about to pay off? They have established a reliable platform from which to work from and look to have enough pace to race in the midfield. The team have worked hard on their understanding of how Honda works and their relationship with the Japanese manufacturer is said to be a lot healthier that McLaren ever managed. Hartley and Gasly to remain as their race drivers. Not a very experienced line up but Hartley will not be doing any endurance racing and concentrate entirely on F1. The car looked reasonable in testing, perhaps a bit skittish on turn in but overall the team were very happy with pre-season resting which had exceeded their expectations. They are now targeting a point’s finish for the first race. There are certainly a lot of positive comments coming from the team and the Honda gamble seems to have been a good one. How it works out over a twenty one race championship is of course the real test. Williams: This year’s car will be the first influenced by ex-Mercedes man Paddy Low. He is one of the top designers and he should make a positive difference. Williams have been strengthening their engineering human resources and have added ex McLaren man Doug McKiernan as chief engineer The car is significantly different to last year’s model, especially in terms of its aerodynamic performance. Basically they are using the same ideas that are seen on the Mercedes and Ferrari 2017 cars. Their car is one that looks the most different to last year’s model so expect a similar difference in performance? The team have described the car as being a lot less conservative than last year’s. It is a (another) make or break year for Williams. They have the Mercedes power units, the best in other words, so they have nowhere to hide if the car isn’t competitive. They have ex-Mercedes and ex-McLaren top man, Paddy Lowe behind the design so he will bring much knowledge of how Mercedes do their stuff and that should improve the Williams. It sounds like a recipe for success but they did not impress in testing. Part of the problem could be who is behind the wheel. Williams have chosen Serge Sirotkin to replace Massa. He, alongside Lance Stroll, leaves a very inexperienced driver line up but much more money in the bank. There has to be big question marks over the two drivers with neither really impressing anyone in testing. Robert Kubica, a proper F1 talent, was considered for the role as race driver but was taken on only as test driver. He did a bit of testing in Barcelona and was unsurprisingly, faster than Sirotkin and Stroll. Williams quickly rallied round their young drivers and said the usual stuff about different programs being run…but yet again the team look to have preferred the millions brought to the team by their pay drivers to employing a proper F1 driver. The car looks a real handful, poor balance, weak on turn in and a bit leery on exit. There is a lot of room for improvement and I can see a difficult season ahead for Williams. They have admitted after the two tests that the car struggles with stability and corner entry. This will make for a very weak performance in Melbourne unless they can sort it out in a matter of days. Sauber: An utter waste of space last season but under new management there are a few more positive signs. The work force has been expended; there is a new title sponsor, Alfa Romeo, and they will have a proper 2018 spec Ferrari power unit. They did show signs of improvement at the end of last season and new boss Frederic Vasseur (ex-Renault boss) knows what he is doing. There is plenty of room for improvement and maybe, if Honda keeps on providing duff power units for Toro Rosso, they can get off the bottom of the table and score a few points. Pascal Wehrlein has been dropped in favour of Ferrari protégé Charles Leclerc. It makes good business sense when requiring a 2018 Ferrari power unit. The links between Ferrari and Sauber are close, not quite a B team but they are getting there. Leclerc is the F2 champion and won GP3 before that so his racing credentials are good. Ferrari see Leclerc as a big part of their future and have invested in Sauber to break him into F1 before replacing Raikkonen, next year probably, if he meets expectations. The new car looks very different to last year’s due their new technical approach. If it all works as hoped then we should see Sauber moving up into the lower midfield. Their weakness may well come down to the driver line up. Leclerc is a newbie to F1 and while Marcus Ericsson has 4 years’ experience he has rarely caught the eye as even a modest talent. Just 9 points from 76 GP’s doesn’t look great even if you are driving a poor car. The longer wheel base for the 2018 car is another nod to their links with Ferrari. The car is a step forward, much more sophisticated and it just has to be better than the last few years of withering on the vine. The new car uses the new Ferrari engine, a Ferrari gearbox and Ferrari rear suspension so it can hardly fail to be a huge improvement. The first test wasn’t very encouraging, over 3 seconds off the pace. The second test saw them 0.5 off the Haas which has a comparable PU. It also looked very skittish to the naked eye in sector three. Mileage wise they did very well but they need to work on performance if they want to move off the bottom. Overall, a decent looking car with better credentials than last year’s dog, but it remains too slow to be a midfielder, at least to start with. Rules and Regulations: The rules are by and large pretty stable this year which can help bunch the field. The biggest change is the three power unit rule. That puts a premium on reliability, a very strong point for Mercedes in recent years. The winter tests showed that all the power units enjoyed very good reliability but we shall have to wait and see and particular attention must be paid to Renault’s power units. The biggest change since last year is the new range of tyres from Pirelli. They changed the compounds last season to manage the extra stresses from the bigger, faster cars. The results were a bit of a failure as the tyres were too durable and it led to boring race strategies and fewer pit stops. This season see’s two new compounds, the hyper soft and super hard tyre. Why the super hard? I have no idea but I wouldn’t expect to see it very often. All of the previous category of compounds have been made softer, so this year’s medium is more like last year’s soft for example. Hopefully this will lead to more pit stops and will give teams more strategic options, which does make the races more interesting. Things will become clearer after a few races. Some cars will be easier on the tyres and with a good strategy a slower car can beat a quicker car. There weren’t many hints about this in testing; the weather and new track surface in Barcelona didn’t help, but hopefully it will become clearer soon. There were a few comments from Red Bull saying that they thought Mercedes were a bit harder on the tyres than Red Bull was but there didn’t seem to be much evidence for that. Summary and Ante Post bets: Sadly I have the horrible feeling that Mercedes are heading for another couple of titles which is exactly what the sport doesn’t need. In the old days, if there was one team dominating the sport, Bernie and Max would find a way to try and destabilise that team, usually with mid-season rules change. Under new ownership politics seems to play a lesser part. There is even talk of Ferrari losing its right of veto for goodness sake. What next? A fairer distribution of prizemoney? Mercedes has the best power unit, its chassis is as good as anyone’s, they have a four time champions as the lead driver. They have the huge resources which allows them to improve race in race out and to employed the right talent in the factory. It’s very very difficult to find a weakness. Opinion is split between who will be the biggest threat. It was Ferrari last year after Red Bull stumbled out of the starting blocks and was further handicapped by the poor reliability of the Renault power units. Ferrari looked good in testing but they didn’t really blow anyone away. They looked like pulling it off with Vettel last year but they just couldn’t keep up the pressure and frustration eventually got to Vettel. The question has to be asked as to how good team are Ferrari under pressure, thinking on their feet, working out the best strategy and so on. In the past they have left something to be desired. Red Bull has a winning mentality, are ready to bend the rules, have the best designer and a very exciting driver line up. The car won a lot of plaudits in testing but they will have to cope with a power deficit which they have done in the past. In Verstappen they have the best new talent to enter the sport for a long time. He has that rare skill to make the car race at the very peak of its abilities and in the wet I suspect has no equal. The head says another boring season of dominance for Hamilton and Mercedes, the heart a breath of fresh air with a first title for Verstappen. He is the future of Red Bull but has a team mate who will push him all the way, which is good for the team and his competitive juices. Verstappen has more experience under his belt now while still young he will have a better idea of what is needed to win. With some firms getting back to offering each way terms for the first three in the title race Verstappen will hopefully give us a run for our money. 2 points e/w Max Verstappen to win the World Championship @ 7.00 with William Hill, Boylesports Sauber have a great looking car this year, not very fast so far, but they should be able to score a point or two. They are heavily backed by Ferrari and have employed a Ferrari protégé, Charles Leclerc, as their new driver to race alongside their owner’s pet racer, Marcus Ericsson. Ericsson technically beat one team mate when he was at Caterham, both had zero points, but he had the highest placed finish. He has lost to his two team mates while at Sauber for the last three seasons and this is expected to continue. Ericsson has rich backers and that’s why he is in F1. Leclerc is in F1 because he won the championships in GP3 and F2 and Ferrari see him as a real talent worthy of driving for them one day. Would Ferrari consider Ericsson? Not even if they were on drugs. 5 points Charles Leclerc to beat Marcus Ericsson @ 1.73 with Coral, Ladbrokes The Australian GP preview will follow later this week.

[jeesus188]

Porno Parm, anna kokkuvõte...mul on elu ka olemas

[Porno Parm]

panustajatel pole

e:
sommidel ka muidugi teine arusaam nagu tavaliselt
http://www.ylikerroin.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=52789

[-Koppel-]

[jeesus188]

40 naela kuus läbi tagumiku...no thanks

[villu70]

Ilmselt odavaim lahendus on oma sateliit televisioon. Panne mis 19.2 astralt sigaali kinni püüaks jagatakse vahest ka tasuta. Vanakooli kasut. tüüneri võib leida 10-15€. Pann seinale ja seadistamine pole ka teab mis ülemõistuse keeruline.
Ostukuulutus õigesse foorumisse ja usun et keegi ilma ei jää.

RTL on vabalevis ja täiesti saab vaadata, reklaamiga natuke tüütavad aga pole hullu. Suvilas kasutan sellist lahendust ja toimib!

[Magic]

palju see panni pea maksab?
RTL oleks päris idee...

[villu70]

need on tavaliselt panniga kaasas, kasut. peast alla 10€ kindlasti
RTL kõlbulik tüüner maksab ka juba alla 10€, puhta muidu juba ju.

link

link

link

[jeesus188]

[karuke]

Kas ennustus ka tulemas on?

[Black66]

https://foorum.hinnavaatlus.ee/viewtopic.php?p=9783270#9783270

[sakinaga]

Seal teemas postitust muuta ei saa (gg, hea disain), seega küsin siin:

Mis nupule vajutama peab?

Spoiler

[Tanel]

sakinaga, kui oled registreerunud, siis paremal on Logi sisse nupp.

[High-Q]

[salatoimik]

Ei tea, mulle käib tasuta acestream kh

[Oliverk]

Vähemalt discis oleva info alusel saab sama tüübi striime seeaasta ka kelle omad eelmine aasta kõigeparemad 6000 bitratega olid. Seega no problemo.

[R3negadeX]

[Anna tooli]

[Porno Parm]

meanwhile striimifännidele
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/134948/f1-delays-launch-of-live-streaming-service

[weasel]

[jeesus188]

[Porno Parm]

eks näeb milline see Vetteli masterplan saab olema
http://sport.delfi.ee/news/auto/f1/f1-hooaeg-tuleb-eriline-juba-uhel-lihtsal-pohjusel?id=81512149

Bottasesse ka usku jätkub

Spoiler

tsitaat:

Bottas Season Race Wins over 2.5 • yes • kerroin 1.83 (B365) • panos 10 yks. Valtteri itse sanonut, että nyt on paljon helpompi aloittaa kausi pienten tekijöiden, kuten esim. paremman ajoasennon takia, kun on ollut heti mukana kehitystyössä. Mercedes vienee tälläkin kaudella mestaruuden, niin vahvat olivat näytöt viimeiseltä testiviikolta. Auto on heti kauden alussa kunnossa, eli siinäkin on etua pahimpiin kilpailijoihin Ferrariin ja Red Bulliin. Bottas voi hyvin jatkaa siitä, mihin viime kausi Abu Dhabissa marraskuussa päättyi, eli uran ensimmäinen hattutemppu: voitto, paalu ja nopein kierros:). Vähempikin riittää. Omilla bookkereilla Mercedeksen tallikertoimet 1.20-1.50, ja uskon että toisella kaudellaan Valtteri on lähempänä Hamiltonia kuin ensimmäisellä kaudella. Viime kaudella Valen statsit oli 3 voittoa, 13 podiumia ja 4 paalua. Kerroin on mun normaali season bet, turha kuittailla. bwin 1.75, Unibet 1.80.

[Sekeldaja]

Maakeelsetest kommentaaridest nii palju, et ei tea, kas see käiks hirmsasti mingite litsensitingimuste rikkumise alla, kui näiteks Motoorse Rahutuse mehed lihtsalt arutleks F1 teemadel otse-eetris ja taustal käib neil etapi otseülekanne
Umbes sama nagu Juur ja Kivirähk R2-s Eurovisiooni ajal. Esse, Klaar ja Vabamäe või siis Kruus ja Elbre ja kasvõi Eller, kui ta veel huvitatud on. Ma oleks mõnda etappi nõus isegi Juure ja Kivirähuga kuulama
Motoorne Rahutus on midagi sellist juba proovinud
Tookord küll ühekordne projekt, kuid võiks veel ühe ühekordse (üheaastase) projekti teha

[lenc]

R2 on ametlik Eurovisiooni ülekanderaadio. See pole mingi isetegevus. Selline skeem nagu sa F1 osas kirjeldad, on igal sajal juhul litsentsitingimuste rikkumine.

[eltso]

Kas on veel vara mõnda head striimiurgast küsida, et esimest treeningut vaadata?

[Porno Parm]

sinna vast tekivad mingi hetk
http://livetv.sx/enx/allupcomingsports/7/

[villu70]

Mingisugused treeningud on käimas ..... no kurat, see "prilllaua" kaar küll selle auto juurde ei sobi.

[Platinet]

Onboard vaade what the...

[Anna tooli]

http://www.sportnews.to/sports/2018/formule-1-gp-van-australie-vrije-training-2-engels/ ~kolme klikiga saab reklaami eest; skysports ülekanne inglise keeles
morningstreams ei paista toimivat

[salatoimik]

acestream: 5ccb0b3946c720137c6bb3b22dcc513c6522b7a7

[jeesus188]

Striimidel ok valiteet ju
screenshot vähe udune tänu liikuvale pildile....aga nagu ma arvasin....mis krd pilt see on board on

Spoiler

https://www.reddit.com/r/motorsportsstreams/comments/86hisn/0500_utc_formula_1_australian_grand_prix_fp2/

[Look Right]

Küllap sellele kaamerale leitakse kiiremas korras mingi lahendus, kuna see pilt on tõesti kole. TÕstavad kõrgemale või ette halo külge vms

[WäntWõll]

Mulle uus ajavõtu ja visuaalne graafika meeldib, vähe interaktiivsem

Turvakaar... pole sõnu.

[ceemic]

[Anna tooli]

[jeesus188]

[Anna tooli]

[jeesus188]

No acestreame oli ka mitmeid.
Need ka ikka aegajalt muutuvad.

Eks tuleb katsetada, mõni parem, mõni kehvem. Backup stream ka igaks juhuks peaks käepäerast olema