[londiste]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/16735651?
graphics score 7932

[DayDream]

Score: 6 032
Graphics Score: 6 427 [EVGA GTX1070 SC + 112 / +345]
CPU Score: 4 475 [Core i5 6600K @ 4.45 GHz]

[XeStAiSy]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/16907684
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/939842
Graphics Score 6 219

1070 asus DUAL OC

läheb juba paremaks
Üleüldiselt on üldse tegemist veidra kaardiga mida pidanud kasutama

[Kurat666]

Profiiliarvuti:

Score: 7007
Graphics Score: 8 243 [2xGTX980 (Asus Matrix ja MSI GTX980)]
CPU Score: 3790 [Core i7 4770K stock]

[ertr2]

profiiliarvutiga: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/17295945? veits parem kui "gaming laptop"
3DMark Score: 4046
Graphics Score: 3958 [MSI R9 390]
CPU Score: 4636 [Core i7 4770K@4,4ghz]

[Evil14]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/998873
i7 4770K
asus strix r9 390
3DMark Score: 4284
Graphics Score: 4240
CPU Score: 4556

[DayDream]

Score: 6 339
Graphics Score: 6 423 [EVGA GTX1070 SC + 113 / +375]
CPU Score: 5 902 [Core i7 6700K @ 4,69 GHz]

[Worm390]

Testisin oma Frankensteini ka veidi:

Spoiler

Graphics 2316
CPU 2756

i7 3740QM + GTX1060
Dell M4700 läpakas välise graafikakaardiga üle Expresscard siini.

[DayDream]

Core i7-7700K @ 5,0 GHz
GF GTX-1070 +113 +375

Score: 6 476
Graphics Score: 6 533
CPU Score: 6 174

[pots4t4j4]

Score: 6850 Graphics: 6901 Cpu: 6577
7700K@5200Mhz
GTX 1070 @ +100core +800mem
2x8gb 3200 ram @ 14-14-14-34-2T

Ega jah ma ei usu, et 1070 kaardist 7k ära tuleb, vähemalt mitte stock jahutusega.

[DayDream]

pots4t4j4, palju prosele voolu annad 5,2 peal?

[XeStAiSy]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/18131388?
6 185 IN Time Spy (V1.0)
Graphics score
6 408
CPU score
5 169

Ei usu ,et rohkem sellest kaardist pigistab cpu jääb jalgu juba

3D MARK tahab rohkem mälu kellasid see meeldib rohkem kui oma kaardi jääb mälu +400 edasi minnes hakkab vastu kaart enamasti voltage limiidis ei taha hästi takistit sildama hakata

See teiste tulemusi uurides jääb 1-0.5 fps alla siis väga ei viitsi pingutada fine tuunimisega.

[anubis]

G4560 koosluses R9 290 TriX, Z270 ja 2133@2666Mhz mäludega http://valid.x86.fr/l0lljf

3DMark Score 3706
Graphics Score 4109
CPU Score 2384
Graphics Test 1 28.27 fps
Graphics Test 2 22.52 fps
CPU Test 8.01 fps

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1261504#
http://www.3dmark.com/tsst/34345

edit: Sama kaart Ryzen R7 1700ga @3,8Ghz http://valid.x86.fr/gusv3t

3DMark Score 4446
Graphics Score 4116
CPU Score 8155
Graphics Test 1 28.35 fps
Graphics Test 2 22.53 fps
CPU Test 27.4 fps

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1434672

[Serio]

R7 1700 @3,8Ghz
GTX 1070

Score: 6 302
Graphics Score: 6 070
CPU Score: 8 045
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/18886765?

[pots4t4j4]

R7 1700 @ 3.9
GTX 980Ti @ 1505/7800
Score: 6617

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1395719

[Draco]

CPU+Mälu: Ryzen 1700X+16GB DDR4@2100 / FX6350 @ 4.3GHz 24GB DDR3@1600
VGA: RX 480 Strix

3DMark Score: 4354 / 3742
Graphics Score: 4056 / 4057
CPU Score: 7467 / 2600

GT1: 27,49 / 27,62
GT2: 22,5 / 22,43

CPU Test: 25,09 / 8,74

[kaidtor]

[High-Q]

R5-1600@3,8, DDR4-3200 CL16
gtx1060 ASUS dual (mingi factory oc)

graph: 4355
cpu: 6157

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19256164

[HDTanel]

[pots4t4j4]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19280424

ryzen 1700 @ 3.9
2x8gb gskill 3200 @ 14-14-14-34-1T
gigabyte gtx 1080ti founders + water @ 2050/12000

Sain suht nigela 1080ti isendi stock biosiga üle 2050mhz ei tee pole üle 1.050v proovinud sõidab power limitisse, ei viitsi shunt modiga ka jaurata see perf gain mis sealt tuleb pole asja väärt. Ryzenil jääb mhz puudu, et inteli 8 tuumalistega võistelda.

SCORE 10 288
Graphics Score 10 689
CPU Score 8 488

[anubis]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1585932
Ryzen 7 1700 http://valid.x86.fr/j9g3ue
Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X OC+ http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/d8rbg/

3DMark Score 5294
Graphics Score 4991
CPU Score 8076
Graphics Test 1 34.18 fps
Graphics Test 2 27.45 fps
CPU Test 27.13 fps

[kaidtor]

[pots4t4j4]

Mis te neist screenshotidest topite, pange korralik link tulemusele, saab inimesemoodi võrrelda.

[kaidtor]

pots4t4j4, Sellel pildil on rohkem infi kui 3Dmargi lingil. http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1569955

[pots4t4j4]

3d marki lingiga on lihtsalt hea oma tulemusega võrrelda paned 2tk kõrvuti kenasti.

[ufo56]

Stock, conf profiilis.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19394862

[Est_RuLx]

Asus G752VS
i7-6820HK
GTX 1070 (notebook)


http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/19440762 5,295p.

[salatoimik]

[Taxta]

Viskame siis enda masina benchmarki ka üles. Kartsin isegi hullemat xD

[Est_RuLx]

[ertr2]

[anubis]

Läpaka 1070 on tegelikult grammi võrra kangem, 2048:128:64 vs 1920:120:64.

[Est_RuLx]

[anubis]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1636363
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/a4ss9
http://valid.x86.fr/e6b5bi

Fury@1125/540

Spoiler

3DMark Score - 5426
Graphics Score - 5117
CPU Score - 8249
Graphics Test 1 - 35.13 fps
Graphics Test 2 - 28.09 fps
CPU Test - 27.72 fps

[kaidtor]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1569955

[Evil14]

[enaber]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20313383

[pots4t4j4]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20336272

no ega 1700 ja 1080ti kombost rohkem vist väga välja ei võlugi

Score 10 383
Graphics Score 10 743
CPU Score 8 729

[aff]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1887430

Ei teagi mida arvata. Pole eriline timespy guru . Keegi pädevam äkki oskab öelda kas saaks vee näpistada skoori suuremaks?

[raimzu]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1901656

[siven]

vahetasin ka oma 1080>1080 ti vastu.
time spy näitab ,et 36% graphic score tõusis ,pole paha!

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1948923
9001 punni.

[Degwees]

Tulemus 4434
GPU: 4340
CPU: 5056

Xeon X5650 @ 4.4ghz
GTX 1060 3GB @ 1744 / 2277 (boost kuni 2150mhz)

[alartt]

Suudab kasutada 2 gpud.

[anubis]

Vega64 @stock ja @GPU undervolt + HBM2 overclock

https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/2333280/spy/2333463

[londiste]

https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/2322724/spy/2325104
sama vega64 kaart, @stock ja veidi teine undervolt/oc tasakaalupunkt.

[pots4t4j4]

Ikka suht masendav potato see vega

[anubis]

Samasse auku GTX1080ga mängudes, muudes rakendustes pigem GTX1080ti/Titan X Pascal/GP100 võrreldav.

MSRPga on tegemist väga hea kaardiga.

[iudicium]

[londiste]

vale teema, ot siin, aga:

iudicium, kaardil on siiski piirid. mu oc tulemuse ajal oli kaardi enda voolutarve juba 350+w (ja reference vent hoidis piisavalt jahedana küll, müratasemest ma siinkohal ei räägi). tulemus sama, mis gtx1080, voolutarve 2x rohkem. jah, sealt on veel ruumi edasi aga juba see on ahi ning aina hullemaks läheb. 400w kanti vist saab ilma räigelt modimata tarbe lasta ja 1650-1700mhz (tunde järgi sealjuures minu käes olnud isendil selle vahemiku madalamasse otsa). aga see ei ole piisav 1080 ees kindla edumaa saavutamiseks, rääkimata 1080ti-st. ja see tahab kindlasti vett, õhuga sinna ei jõua.

muuks kui mängimiseks, jah.

aga et oleks vähem ot, siis eelpool mainitud vega64 tulemus kõrvuti stockis 1080 tulemusega:
https://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/2322290/spy/2325104
test1-s on osakaal rohkem shaderite poole, test 2 on sama shaderite hulgaga aga veidi rohkem geomeetriat ja palju rohkem tessellationit.

Spoiler

[anubis]

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/2375901
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/z39nw

Vega64 @ stock core/1100mhz HBM2 @1050mv core (-150mv undervolt)/stock HBM2

3DMark Score - 7628
Graphics Score - 7481
CPU Score - 8585
Graphics Test 1 - 51.88 fps
Graphics Test 2 - 40.73 fps
CPU Test - 28.85 fps

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/2375365
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/us69r

GTX650Ti @stock

3DMark Score - 1014
Graphics Score - 878
CPU Score - 8546
Graphics Test 1 - 5.88 fps
Graphics Test 2 - 4.92 fps
CPU Test - 28.71 fps