[Ramones]

Nüüd esimene korralik DX12 bench väljas - 3DMark Time Spy

DirectX 12 support for game engines has been coming along for a few months now. To join in the fray Futuremark has written the Time Spy benchmark on top of a pure DirectX 12 engine. This brings features such as asynchronous compute, explicit multi-adapter, and of course multi-threading/multi-core work submission improvements. All of this comes together into what I think is not only visually interesting, but also borrows a large number of gaming assets from benchmarks of 3DMarks past.



Lähemat lugemist:
http://www.futuremark.com/pressreleases/introducing-3dmark-time-spy-directx-12-benchmark-test
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10486/futuremark-releases-3dmark-time-spy-directx12-benchmark

Teen otsa lahti:
GTX780 (1215/1625) i5-6600K (4.5GHz) - 3286
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/11782

[erick]

2745p - Xeon E5465 2,4GHz 6c/12t @ 4GHz + GTX Titan 6GB stock: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13202280?

[londiste]

5001p - i7-6700k ja 980ti
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13202497?

[NightStriker]

3714p with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970(1x) and Intel Core i7-6700K stock
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14253

[Firefly]

3 685 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970(1x) and Intel Core i5-6600K
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13204121?

Kusagilt pole näha, et mis resol see test jooksis, tundus nagu oleks 1440p olnud

[londiste]

test peaks jooksma 1440p resol.

[madest]

3 859 MSI R290 Gaming@stock ja Intel 3930k @4.2
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14504

[busta]

3768p 970@1436 2600K@4.6
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13233240

[A-Circus.]

2535p
Cpu: FX 8350@stock
GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 380 4GB@stock
Videokaardi driver pole küll kõige uuem.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13237326

[Levelxer]

5564p
CPU - i7 3770K @ 4.2Ghz
GPU - MSI GTX 1070 ARMOR 8G OC @ 1873/2311

Uuemate driveritega: 5851p
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13239247

[trip]

guru3d
20 gpu
http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/futuremark-3dmark-timespy-benchmark-review,1.html

[1dumbpcuser]

2 376 link
CPU: Core i5 4460 3,2GHz (stock)
GPU: Gigabyte 7970 GHz Edition 1100/1500 (stock)

Spoiler

3DMark Score 2376
Graphics Score - 2311
CPU Score - 2835
Graphics Test 1 - 15.81 fps
Graphics Test 2 - 12.72 fps
CPU Test - 9.53 fps

[busta]

3 860 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970(1x) and Intel Core i7-2600K Processor 970@1819/1482 2600K@4.6
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13240099

[NATAS999]

6 232
2xGTX970 1366/1800
i5-3570K 4.6GHz
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13242363?

prose vist pisut pidurdab

[madest]

5 922 GTX 1070 Gigabyte G1@stock ja i7 3930k @ 4.2
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13252117?

[anubis]

4268p, RX 480@1300, E5-2680V4 ES.

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/39034

[Synergy]

2258p

FX-8320 @ 4.3Ghz
Club3D 280x Stock

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13289498

[1dumbpcuser]

[Martin_S]

Sandy is old, but not obsolete, venitasin 4K ära

GTX970 + I7 2700K @ 4,8GHz
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/55857
SCORE
4 027

GTX970 + I7 2700K @ 4,2GHz
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/55732
SCORE
3 950

Ootame võrdlust Kaidoga. Oli vist sama kaart sul.

[Braien]

3 304 with AMD Radeon RX 480(1x) and AMD FX-6300

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13293405

[trip]

gtx1080/3770k 6800
Graphics Score 7365
CPU Score 4753

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/56745

[Firefly]

[slayer]

Strix GTX 970 - 1454/8000MHz ja Core i5-4690K @4,5GHz (1,27v)

Score: 3874
Graphics Score - 3899
CPU Score - 3739

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13292588

[Martin_S]

[NightStriker]

[Martin_S]

Mul on default 1114 MHz, lisasin +180, kokku 1294 MHz. Reaalne (boost) kell on muidugi kõrgem, aga seda pedemark ju ei tuvasta.

[Lehys]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13341405?

i7 3770K @ 4,2 gpu stockis

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/75132/spy/75013 stock vs 24/7 kellatud

6 190 ja 6 645

kaart gtx1080

[Flab]

Kas seda saab tasuta ka alla laadida, või ainult tasulise lõbuga tegu? Ei tahaks uskuda, et terve HV foorum selle soetanud on?!

[NightStriker]

Flab, miks mitte. Mänge me ostame. Mõni asi siis Steami sooduka ajal ka 3dmark paari € eest soetada.

[anubis]

Tasuta, ikka, saab ka.

[neoman]

Praegu saab 12€ eest 3dmark Advance Futuremark lehelt, millega antakse Spy key kaasa.

[ViskeRelv]

R9 380 4GB + A10-7850K
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13342430
Score
2444

[slayer]

Flab, Minul on 3D Mark ostetud Steam Sale'i käigus mingi 9€ eest oli vist. Time Spy tuli lisamoodulina sel nädalal lisaks.

[Flab]

Okei . Uurin, lihtsalt kodulehel olid nende suitede hinnad mitusada kuni tuhat .

[neoman]

5635

4790k/ 980Ti

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13344437

[NATAS999]

mul tuli ühega gpu'dest 3d marki võti kaasa, time spy ise on mul see tasuta variant.

[montecrist]

Score: 3327

2500k 4,3 2x 660ti stock

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13342914

[Flab]

Score:4495

Fury x + 4790

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13346679?

[Serio]

SCORE
4 349

FX 8320
R9 Fury

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13351946?

[Flab]

[WäntWõll]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13359387?

Score 4070

AMD Radeon R9 390(1x) GPU 1095MHz MEM 1500MHz and Intel Core i5-4690K @ 4600MHz

[JDF]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/71179 3515 uute driveritega, vanadega oli 3487. Eurocom P750ZM i7-4790, 980M +200 ja +360.

[Draco]

3DMark Spy: 3586

Graphics Score: 3603
Graphics test 1: 24.21 fps
Graphics test 2: 20.13 fps

CPU test: 3497
CPU test: 11.75 fps

FX8350 @ 4.5 GHz
R9 290 DC2OC Stock
16GB DDR3

[ViskeRelv]

[anubis]

http://www.overclock.net/t/1606224/various-futuremarks-time-spy-directx-12-benchmark-compromised-less-compute-parallelism-than-doom-aots-also

[londiste]

[anubis]

Ehk et siis valime Nvidiale kõige soodsama rendering pathi? :\

Benchmark või asi. Seljuhul pigem Nvidia techdemo.

AoS/Doom suudeti vastavalt teha tootjaagnostiline render path vastavalt DX12/Vulcan API spekile ja nüüd ühes olulisematest benchmarkidest ei suudetud...

[londiste]

anubis, lugesin teemat. lisaks raskelt loetavusele ei ole ma just väga kindel, milles täpselt probleem on.
asynci kasutatakse - kasutatakse. preemption ja väidetavalt nvidia-spetsiifiline implementatsioon tundub üsna punane heeringas olema.
async kasutamise % on madalam kui aots ja doomi puhul aga tulemused käivad üsna sama jalga aots ja muude varasemate dx12/async tulemustega.

doom benchina on väga kahtlane eriti kui võrdlusena kasutada - korralikku timedemo/benchi mängul pole ja tulemused varieeruvad sõna otseses mõttes seinast seina.

[anubis]

Futuremark väidab, et Time Spy kasutab async compute - kõik faktid viitavad sellele, et ta kasutab nvidia spetsiifilist ehk pseudo-asynci tarkvaralise scheduleriga.

AMD GCN kaardid istuvad ka keerutavad pöidlaid, selleasemel, et idle ressurssi samalajal kasutada (mis ongi async compute idee). AoS ja Doom suudavad kaartide võimekust (AMD GCN) kasutada 6-8x efektiivsemalt kui nn. benchmark? Mis kuramuse benchmark see on..

edit:
Nõustun järgneva väitega.

[londiste]

kuidas su rx480 timespys käitub, gpu load, voolutarve? miks see pöidlaid keerutab?