[NATAS999]

hakka või isegi vee peale mõtlema. hetkel noctua NH-C14 ja sellega käivad tuumad 90C juures, CPU näitab 60C kanti.

[Tomorrow]

Ju mul siis veidi parem 2500K isend. 4.7Ghz 1.35V. Vb teeb ka vähemaga sama takti, aga annan igaks juhuks veidi rohkem. Tempid kah normis
Offset voldi kasutamisest küll loobusin, sest masin lihtsalt polnud stabiilne. Tõenäoliselt BIOS-i süü. Manuaalsega pole probleeme olnud.

[Kristoferr]

Tihti on nii, et offset pingega on prose küll stabillne @ full load, aga power save settingutel viskab sinist. Asi selles, et kui undervoltida, siis lahutab offset pinget maha ka säästurežiimidel töötamisest ja cpu ei pruugi ühel neist enam stabiilne olla. Endalgi nii. Prose oleks 1.2v @ 4500mhz stabiilne, aga näiteks x32 kordaja peal viskab 1v kandis pange. Niisiis sättisin ta tööle @ 1.22v 4500mhz ja on kenasti stabiilne.
Temperatuurid on mul pigem kõrged. Venomus X ja üks 600-800rpm vendikas. Koormustestis tulev 85C ära. Igapäevakasutuses siiski kunagi üle 80C ei lähe.

[1dumbpcuser]

Mõningaid noppeid Inteli töötaja AMA-st:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/15iaet/iama_cpu_architect_and_designer_at_intel_ama/

Q: Why are there no full i7 chips on socket 2011? all of the chips are broken xeons, they do not have all cores enabled, and they do not have all of the cashe enabled. and a side question on this topic, why are all of the xeons locked, the top sku or two used to be unlocked?

A: There will be one Haswell variant that is going to attempt to fix this break up of the high end desktop from the mainstream. But to answer your question as honestly as I can, I don't think it's the case about the cores or the cache. The default SKU for Jaketown is 6 cores and 15MB cache. Let me know otherwise.

Q: As a person who just bought an Ivy-bridged based system, is there anything you can tell me to convince myself to save up for a haswell or broadwell system?

A: What do you usually do with your system? If you like to overclock, Haswell is worth it (can't tell you why but read the Haswell Anandtech preview very carefully for buried treasure). On-die graphics is improving quite a bit as well. If you're into energy efficiency or even more graphics, Broadwell. I think the tech community will be very pleasantly surprised with Broadwell. But I'm biased, so we'll just going to have to prove it the hard way.

Q: I'm sure you heard about all the Intel-is-going-to-BGA news about a month ago. Any reactions? As an enthusiast who likes building my machines, is Intel still looking out for us or we're basically boned?

A: It's wrong. As I mentioned above, the people who leak the rumors assume too many things incorrectly. That said, we are definitely going very BGA-heavy for a variety of reasons.

Q: Is it true your intel bathrooms have laptop holders?

A: Yes, next to the door and every stall. The way the holders are designed you actually need to close the laptop to get it to fit in the holder. Sorry it's not as gross as you picture it.

Q: Does Intel have any plans to make graphics chips this millennium?

A: We are allocating more die area to graphics. So expect to see a definite improvement from Ivy Bridge to Haswell. Then expect a bigger leap from Haswell to Broadwell. My guess is we will leapfrog ATI on-die graphics with Broadwell.

Q: With chips being soldiered onto board in the future, what does this mean for custom built PCs, is the custom PC market going to die?
Will desktop PCs all move to ARM processors? Will Intel ever be relevant in the mobile space?
In your opinion, what is the best CPU architecture that has ever been designed? Why?

A: That is most likely a false rumor or misinterpreted information.
It's my job to make all form factors of computing machines run on our processors. To be completely candid (personal opinion disclaimer), with what I know is coming from Intel, the likelihood of ARM getting into the PC space is very low. Nevertheless, we're not taking our foot off the gas. For mobile, we have no choice but to become relevant. As for when, my personal prediction for substantial growth is Q1 2014, domination in 2015.
P6. It's proven to be very scalable across power and performance. But I'm biased.

[Tomorrow]

[londiste]

1dumbpcuseri postile lisaks, et seal ama-s on veel üht-teist lugemisväärset.

[Pajula]

[Tomorrow]

Pajula, Iga müüja kiidab oma kraami. Pärast kirub maapõhja ja irvitab, et saastast lahti sai

[kenkauksi]

Kes mida üldse oma i7 prosedega teeb et niipalju jõudlust vaja? Endal tiksub 3770k arvutis ja mõtlen kuidas seda kõige paremini ära kasutada , ilma klokkimata suudan ka nii 70% heal juhul ära kasutada

[kusti85]

[caramis]

[kusti85]

toosama neh. Mitte heategevuslik, for science you know... Pealegi tuba vaja ka kütta. (24/7 full loadis, ei ole muret, et miskit kasutamata jääks)

[rmc]

[WäntWõll]

iga W mõttetult palju

[1dumbpcuser]

Report: Intel Haswell to be Released on June 2, 2013
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-haswell-cpu-processor,20042.html

[Jaanos]

Jah, jäi ka silma, et esialgne lootus Haswelli juba aprillis näha läks loojakarja.

[lolloom]

[kenkauksi]

See folding@home ei tundu just kõige mõistlikum kasutusviis oma prosele. Midagi muud tarka siis polegi teha oma võimsate prosedega?

[Alan]

[kaidtor]

lolloom, 3770K defis võrgust koos ühe ketaga prime95-ga 165W 6100+ Wprime ajal 450+W

[Degwees]

Sai veidi oma 2500K-d jälle "lõhutud", igav hakkas, sest terve aasta on kenasti 4.5GHz 1.27v käinud.
Kuna vahepeal sai proovitud tõsta pinget 1.35v peale ja 4.9GHz peal isegi 3DMark11 läbitud, hakkas selle tõttu ka isu kasvama . 5GHz ei bootinud kohe kuidagi, aga ilmselt oma laiskuse tõttu pigem. Nüüd siis võtsin jälle ette, eesmärgiks bootida 5GHz peal toasoojas. Veidi sai uuritud ja proovisin CPU PLL-iga mängida, default oli 1.83v. 1.83-1.89 ei bootinud. Järgmisena hakkasin langetama - 1.81 nada, 1.79 nada, 1.77 nada, 1.76 - boot! Kohe nägu peas peeretas, et üldse õnnestus! Anyways, 1.75-1.76v tundus olevat parim pinge minu 2500K-le, proovisin mõlema pinge ajal ka prime'ida, 1.76v peal kõnges kohe, 1.75v pll peal kannatas 30 sekundit ära ja freeze'is. Langetasin kloki 4.9ghz peale ja siiani prime'inud kenasti üle tunni aja . Lühendasin muidu testide pikkust 15 minuti pealt 1 minuti peale, et ta kõik block size'id kiiremini läbi käiks. Loodetavasti püsib ka nii.

E: Aga skriini krt ei teinud, nüüd nagu tühja kargan . Eks ma hiljem teen.

[lolloom]

Degwees, 5,0GHz jaoks suuremat Vcore ka vaja 1,40V vähemalt.

[Degwees]

lolloom, ma 4.9GHz-ga rahul hetkel, üle 1.35v ei ole tahtnud minna, sest suur onu Intel ütles et ei tohi, teeb aia-aia CPU-le.
Igatahes, nüüd peaks ehk 4.5GHz peal ka madalama pingega käima, kunagi hiljem ehk proovin 1.24-1.25v ära.

[caramis]

[Alan]