Hinnavaatlus
:: Foorum
:: Uudised
:: Ärifoorumid
:: HV F1 ennustusvõistlus
:: Pangalink
:: Telekavad
:: HV toote otsing
|
|
autor |
|
bugbrake
HV kasutaja
liitunud: 10.12.2006
|
16.03.2025 14:28:58
|
|
|
Ilmekas näide kui rumal ta on. Loll mis loll ...
_________________ Alati teadke, et kuulujutte mõtlevad välja vihkajad, levitavad lollid, aga usuvad idioodid. |
|
Kommentaarid: 6 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
6 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
MatchMaker
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 23.06.2007
|
17.03.2025 20:34:19
|
|
|
tsitaat: |
 |
....
|
|
Kommentaarid: 2 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
2 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
HPN
HV veteran

liitunud: 26.06.2007

|
17.03.2025 20:58:08
|
|
|
Kus oleks USA ilma prantslasteta? Võibolla ei oleks kunagi eksisteerinudki.
|
|
Kommentaarid: 48 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
47 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
MatchMaker
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 23.06.2007
|
18.03.2025 02:11:13
|
|
|
tsitaat: |
 |
|
|
Kommentaarid: 2 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
2 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
anubis
HV Guru

liitunud: 08.06.2002
|
19.03.2025 11:37:28
|
|
|
Huvitav kas ta tiblade käest vähemalt mune palus selle kõige parema ja konstruktiivsema kõne ajal mutiniga?
|
|
Kommentaarid: 326 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
2 :: |
0 :: |
277 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Auron
HV Guru

liitunud: 19.08.2003
|
19.03.2025 11:47:06
|
|
|
anubis kirjutas: |
Huvitav kas ta tiblade käest vähemalt mune palus selle kõige parema ja konstruktiivsema kõne ajal mutiniga? |
Kas sa oled juba Mutin Punnile helistand ja luband sierraga seina maha sõita kui kohe sõda ei lõpeta?
|
|
Kommentaarid: 152 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
129 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
anubis
HV Guru

liitunud: 08.06.2002
|
20.03.2025 00:24:25
|
|
|
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/18/minnesota-justin-eichorn-arrested-soliciting-minor
tsitaat: |
A Republican state lawmaker in Minnesota who recently introduced a bill to create a mental illness category for liberals obsessed over Donald Trump was arrested on Tuesday for allegedly soliciting a minor for prostitution.
Minnesota senator Justin Eichorn was arrested and booked on Tuesday. He believed he was talking to a 17-year-old female, but was communicating instead with detectives from the Bloomington, Minnesota, police department, police allege.
|
|
|
Kommentaarid: 326 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
2 :: |
0 :: |
277 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
MatchMaker
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 23.06.2007
|
20.03.2025 00:28:16
|
|
|
link :: Bannon tells Cuomo Trump will run and win third term
tsitaat: |
Former White House strategist Steve Bannon leaned into President Trump’s aspirations for a third term, suggesting Trump will run and win in 2028 while denying his own presidential ambitions.
“I’m a firm believer that President Trump will run and win again in 2028, so I’ve already endorsed President Trump,” Bannon told NewsNation’s Chris Cuomo. “A man like this comes along once every century, if we’re lucky. We’ve got him now.” |
https://x.com/factpostnews/status/1902377254694613475
|
|
Kommentaarid: 2 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
2 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Renka
HV Guru

liitunud: 01.04.2002
|
20.03.2025 05:36:24
|
|
|
tsitaat: |
This is from a local history teacher I have known for a while Michael Otto (for some reason it won’t let me tag you):
‘I teach both American and international government. For years, I've been going over "case study" states, from mostly democratic (UK) to democratizing-but-corrupt (Mexico, Nigeria) to illiberal-authoritarian (Russia) to theocratic (Iran) to traditional authoritarian (China).
When it comes to the difference between democracy and authoritarianism, one thing Americans need to understand is that there's never one single moment where you become an authoritarian state; no leader will stand up and announce, "I am now a dictator."
Putin is the classic case study for gradual, effective subversion of democracy. Russia had been democratizing for about a decade when he took over in 2000, and now -even though Russia ostensibly still has the appearance of democracy: elections, separation of powers, federalism, and a constitution- none of that matters: Putin is in absolute control. And Putin is, coincidentally , the authoritarian most vocally admired by Donald Trump.
But how screwed are we? Well, as any first-year political science student can assert, there are ways -very simple, clear-cut, definitive ways- to tell when your democracy is in danger. Let's go over them, shall we?
1. You know you're drifting towards authoritarianism when...Your Legislative Branch cedes power to your President.
Montesquieu (and later Madison) envisioned the Legislative Branch as the primary work horse of government: It was made -in part- to check the President's excesses. It has far more powers than the President, it's more representative of the people than the President, and it was specifically given the abilities to restrain, overrule, or remove the President. In all of U.S. history, the legislature was never intended to be subservient to executive power. When a President's rule sidesteps legislative functions, and the Congress allows it, the balance of power is subverted.
For the record, Putin's rise initially faced resistance from his own legislative Duma -serving their constitutional function- until he cowed them, forcing out resistors and intimidating dissent, eventually rewriting the rules as to how they were elected to install loyalists exclusively.
Ask yourself: Has the U.S. Congress been ceding power to President Trump, diminishing in importance as the president's role grows?
2. You know you're drifting towards authoritarianism when...Corporatism becomes normalized. Corporatism is a political system whereby for-profit business groups (i.e. mass media and energy) become the most impactful partners in the government's policymaking process.
Authoritarians need industry leaders (and more importantly, their money) in order to spread their influence. Consequently, deals are made and favors traded (tax cuts in exchange for favorable reporting, for instance) that further enhance the power of the oligarchs and President over that of the people.
For the record, Putin allowed profiteering for oligarchs who would help him (the Rotenburgs: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55872249 and Yuri Kovalchuk: https://www.forbes.com/profile/yuri-kovalchuk/ ) and persecuted or jailed those who opposed him (Mikhail Borisovich Khodorkovsky).
Ask yourself: Has President Trump empowered corporations who aided him and diminished those who opposed him in order to gain more power?
3. You know you're drifting towards authoritarianism when...You begin to wonder if your President will obey the Constitution.
Rule of law is considered one of the four pillars of democracy, and the U.S. -despite its foibles- has a strong tradition of adherence to this concept. For many countries, the Constitution is just a piece of paper, altered on the fly when it suits the regime (example: every Chinese president before Xi Xinping had term limits; now -with a wave of the pen- he does not). If obeying the U.S. Constitution becomes a question rather than an expectation, that is not in the American tradition of democracy.
For the record, Putin regularly violates the civil liberties present within the Russian constitution: restricting protests, intimidating (or outright murdering journalists), and jailing political opponents.
Ask yourself: Have President Trump's actions ever threatened constitutional norms or the rule of law in pursuit of personal gain?
4. You know you're drifting towards authoritarianism when...Your President creates enemies for you to turn on, both internally and externally.
This is pretty much textbook fascism, frankly, but I'm shocked at how easily it's getting overlooked. Look, one cannot be a hero without a villain, and who is more easily vanquished than the vulnerable? If you can turn your citizenry onto a witch hunt against its own people, then that is a useful tool for power grabs in the name of "security." And if you can turn them against a foreign adversary, then that's even better: nothing promotes nationalism like warfare...especially easily won warfare.
For the record, in addition to turning the Russian population against their own state of Chechnya, Putin has demonized the LGBT population, recently making even symbolic support of them criminal ( https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/02/15/russia-first-convictions-under-lgbt-extremist-ruling ). And of course, there was always the expectation of an easy win against Ukraine, especially after the world just let them seize Crimea in 2014.
Ask yourself: Has President Trump encouraged us to turn on any of our fellow Americans...or created any new foreign enemies out of historic allies?
5. You know you're drifting towards authoritarianism when...Your President elevates loyalty to himself personally over that of the country as the most desirable characteristic of government agents and military personnel.
Consider: Though most cabinet members are rotated out when a new president enters, the vast majority of bureaucrats and soldiers (everyone from staff sergeants to park rangers) stay in place, keeping the machinery of government running, as their oath is to the Constitution, not a specific human being. Authoritarians see that as insufficient, replacing elements of the bureaucracy -especially military and law enforcement- who will criticize implementation -or refuse illegal execution- of presidential will.
For the record, one of Putin's first actions when becoming President was to put the FSB (their version of the FBI) under the direct control of the President (himself). Prior to that, there had been the detachment between law enforcement and political power expected and traditional to western democracies. From May 17, 2000 onward, they became a tool of his will, incrementally expanded in power and wielded against his enemies ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Security_Service ).
Ask yourself: Has President Trump appointed government agents -especially military and law enforcement agents- that have vocalized loyalty to him personally, as well as advocated for vengeance against his political enemies?
Sigh. I'm tired, but I could go on and on. There's a phrase that's been paraded lately: "Democracy dies in darkness." In my experience, that's not necessarily what's happening here. Despite the backslide in democratic qualities we're experiencing lately, the one we have in spades is transparency: Thanks to a vibrant media empire -as well as Trump's narcissistic self-promotion- we are constantly aware of the moves he is making to subvert the norms of our regime.
That said, as democracy dies in America, it won't be in darkness. It will be within our sight and with our permission.’ |
_________________ There is no place like 127.0.0.1 |
|
Kommentaarid: 71 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
2 :: |
1 :: |
61 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
-Koppel-
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 01.04.2009
|
20.03.2025 11:42:51
|
|
|
MatchMaker kirjutas: |
tsitaat: |
Former White House strategist Steve Bannon leaned into President Trump’s aspirations for a third term, suggesting Trump will run and win in 2028 while denying his own presidential ambitions.
“I’m a firm believer that President Trump will run and win again in 2028, so I’ve already endorsed President Trump,” Bannon told NewsNation’s Chris Cuomo. “A man like this comes along once every century, if we’re lucky. We’ve got him now.” |
https://x.com/factpostnews/status/1902377254694613475 |
LOL.
Huvitav, kas see Trumpile peesse pugemine on mingi mäng mida härrad peavad. Et kes suudab kõige imalamal viisil Trumpi ülistada.
Juamala asemik maapeal. Teava kingitus. Inimkonna kroonjuveel.
|
|
Kommentaarid: 10 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
10 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
CnZ
HV veteran
liitunud: 05.11.2003
|
20.03.2025 12:47:41
|
|
|
Ma arvan, et Bannon ikka proovib ise kandideerida, eriti kui eitad kandideerimist. Meenutuseks DeSantis pikalt aastaid eitas, et kandideerib ja et Trump on parim kes meil on, aga siis viimasel hetkel suslik tõmbas ikka vaiba jalge alt
|
|
Kommentaarid: 14 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
13 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
iir
HV Guru

liitunud: 20.06.2006
|
20.03.2025 15:18:27
|
|
|
Kutsus oma sõbrad teistest osariikidest koos palvetama
Spoiler 
_________________ sometimes i hug myself for no reason.
you dont need a reason to call me. me not answer anyway |
|
Kommentaarid: 90 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
82 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
bugbrake
HV kasutaja
liitunud: 10.12.2006
|
20.03.2025 15:52:41
|
|
|
Trump ja siiras tõsiusklik kristlane
Spoiler 
_________________ Alati teadke, et kuulujutte mõtlevad välja vihkajad, levitavad lollid, aga usuvad idioodid. |
|
Kommentaarid: 6 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
6 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
jeesus188
kodustatud

liitunud: 14.04.2003
|
|
Kommentaarid: 71 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
64 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
CnZ
HV veteran
liitunud: 05.11.2003
|
21.03.2025 01:44:50
|
|
|
USA har.min ei ole päris see elukas samade funktsioonidega, mis Haridusministeerium meil näiteks. Loe natuke teema kohta
Lisaks Valge maja pressisekretär:
tsitaat: |
"It's not going to be shut down," Leavitt said. "Pell Grants and student loans will still be run out of the department in Washington, D.C., but the great responsibility of educating our nation's students will return to the states."
|
|
|
Kommentaarid: 14 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
13 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
netcat
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 13.01.2010
|
21.03.2025 02:43:05
|
|
|
See loodigi neil alles 1979. Enne seda vist said kuidagimoodi hakkama ja ei olnud päris lollidemaa, pigem on mida edasi, seda hullemaks asi läinud ju. Mitte et ma tahaks seisukohta võtta, kas seda on või ei ole vaja laiali saata.
|
|
Kommentaarid: 6 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
6 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
HPN
HV veteran

liitunud: 26.06.2007

|
21.03.2025 08:11:53
|
|
|
Arvestades kui tagurliku ja keskaegse mõtlemisega mõnda osariiki juhitakse, siis midagi head inimestel sellest plaanist loota ei tasu.
|
|
Kommentaarid: 48 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
47 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
degrass
HV kasutaja

liitunud: 23.12.2004
|
21.03.2025 11:09:29
|
|
|
Haridus on ülehinnatud. Rumalaid inimesi on lihtsam valitseda. Diktaatoril on vaja väljendada ennast ainult sisutute lihtlausetega ning kestvad ovatsioonid on garanteeritud. Ja üldse, milleks inimesele, kes sureb kümne kilomeetri raadiuses oma sünnikohast, mingit haridust vaja?
_________________ All it took was for a lot of seemingly decent people to put the wrong person in power, and then pay for their innocent choice. |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
netcat
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 13.01.2010
|
21.03.2025 12:27:06
|
|
|
Samas! Kuna kõik föderaalsed institutsioonid on praegu Trumpi käpa all, siis kumb on parem - kas see kui kogu riigi haridust juhitakse nii, nagu tema käseb, või juhtumisi need osariigid, mida ei juhita keskaegse mõtlemisega, saavad ise rohkem otsustada oma haridusküsimusi?
|
|
Kommentaarid: 6 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
6 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
jeesus188
kodustatud

liitunud: 14.04.2003
|
21.03.2025 13:42:18
|
|
|
Kas kongress vms. koht ei peaks kinnitama Donaldi käske või nii ongi, et tüüp hommikul ärkab ja otsustab suvaliselt?
Saan aru, et ta parteil enamus parlamendis, aga kõik ei saa nüüd tema poolt ka olla
_________________ This message was sent from space using stargate
Inimene on troopiline AHV Aga kes on naine? Valge on ka inimene !
"Vaese inimese juttu räägid. Kui tundub kallis, siis on see kellelegi teisele mõeldud" |
|
Kommentaarid: 71 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
64 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
kyrvas
HV vaatleja
liitunud: 25.05.2005
|
21.03.2025 13:46:21
|
|
|
See piir pole veel kätte jõudnud, et vabariiklased riskiksid oma naha turule viia, et Trumpile vastu hakata.
Lisaks on ju ka õhus Muski ähvardus konkurente rahastada kui keegi vabariiklane Trumpi vastu hääletab.
|
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
Diginugis
HV kasutaja

liitunud: 14.05.2006
|
21.03.2025 14:21:43
|
|
|
bugbrake kirjutas: |
Ilmekas näide kui rumal ta on. Loll mis loll ... |
Strateegiline lüke lihtsalt. Vaja see paremaks saada:
Spoiler 
_________________ PORTFOLIO
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ |
|
Kommentaarid: 76 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
70 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
degrass
HV kasutaja

liitunud: 23.12.2004
|
21.03.2025 15:45:42
|
|
|
netcat kirjutas: |
Samas! Kuna kõik föderaalsed institutsioonid on praegu Trumpi käpa all, siis kumb on parem - kas see kui kogu riigi haridust juhitakse nii, nagu tema käseb, või juhtumisi need osariigid, mida ei juhita keskaegse mõtlemisega, saavad ise rohkem otsustada oma haridusküsimusi? |
Ma ei tea k6iki detaile, kuid ma pakun, et kui haridusteema detsentraliseeritakse piiratakse sellega noorte sotsiaalset ja ka akadeemilist mobiilsust.
_________________ All it took was for a lot of seemingly decent people to put the wrong person in power, and then pay for their innocent choice. |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
anubis
HV Guru

liitunud: 08.06.2002
|
|
Kommentaarid: 326 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
2 :: |
0 :: |
277 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
netcat
Kreisi kasutaja

liitunud: 13.01.2010
|
21.03.2025 20:03:58
|
|
|
Trumpi ja Muski käe all ei ole ükski föderaalne institutsioon enam depolitiseeritud.
|
|
Kommentaarid: 6 loe/lisa |
Kasutajad arvavad: |
   |
:: |
0 :: |
0 :: |
6 |
|
tagasi üles |
|
 |
|