[tahanteada]

Hoiatus: Järgmine lugu pole "rohelistele", veel vähem on see sobilik "padurohelistele"!

Business Insider ennustab juba lähikümnenditel Energiakatastroofi...

Lühidalt kokkuvõtvalt:
1. aastaks 2040 kasvab rahvastikuarv 9 miljardi inimeseni.
2. maailma energeetikatööstus, kaasa arvatult "kuulus roheline energeetika", ei suuda seda inimmassi enam piisavalt energiaga varustada, tuues endaga kaasa energiakatastroofi.
3. Ja nii pöörataksegi pilgud taas toorimi kasutamisele kuna toorium tagab vajaliku energiatootmise veel miljoniteks aastateks.

Nüüd siis lugu ise - kes julgeb, see loeb ja kellele selline "tuuma-teema" ei meeldi, see peab siis pretensiooni esitama Business Insiderile.

Dave Mosher
Feb. 25, 2017
A forgotten war technology could safely power Earth for millions of years. Here's why we aren't using it

Tsitaat:
The lifeblood of modern civilization is affordable, free-flowing energy.

It gives us the power to heat our homes. Grow and refrigerate food. Purify water. Manufacture products. Perform organ transplants. Drive a car. Go to work. Or procrastinate from work by reading a story about the future of energy.

Today's cheap, bountiful supplies make it hard to see humanity's looming energy crisis, but it's possibly coming within our lifetimes. Our numbers will grow from 7.36 billion people today to 9 billion in 2040, an increase of 22%. Rapidly developing nations, however, will supercharge global energy consumption at more than twice that rate.

Fossil fuels could quench the planet's deep thirst for energy, but they'd be a temporary fix at best. Known reserves may dry up within a century or two. And burning up that carbon-based fuel would accelerate climate change, which is already on track to disrupt and jeopardize countless lives.

Meanwhile, renewable energy sources like wind and solar, though key parts of a solution, are not silver bullets — especially if the world is to meet a 2050 deadline set by the Paris Agreement. Energy from fusion is promising, but it's not yet proved to work, let alone on a commercial and competitive scale.

Nuclear reactors, on the other hand, fit the bill: They're dense, reliable, emit no carbon, and — contrary to bitter popular sentiment — are among the safest energy sources on earth. Today, they supply about 20% of America's energy, though by the 2040s, this share may drop to 10% as companies shut down decades-old reactors, according to a July 2016 report released by Idaho National Laboratory (INL).

Pikk jutt siis lingil - head lugemist...
http://www.businessinsider.com/thorium-molten-salt-reactors-sorensen-lftr-2017-2
-------------------
Märkusena: tooriumi katsetamine kestab tegelikult usinalt - olgugi, et sellest ei taheta avalikult midagi rääkida.
Järgmises videos - katsetatakse igatahes "toorium-auto prototüüpi" ja mille toorium-patarei peab vastu 100 aastat:

Link